Aaron Vaughn v. Imohoff, et al
Defendant / Appellee: LIEUTENANT SCHAMP, (RHU Lt. 2-10pm shift), SERGEANT TIKEY, (Sgt. of F-B Pod 6 to 2am shift), CORRECTION OFFICER STECKLY, (Pod Officer of F-B Pod 2-10pm shift), CORRECTION OFFICER GILL, CORRECTION OFFICER CARTER, (Pod Officer of F-B Pod from -, CORRECTION OFFICER W. PEREZ-RAMOS, CORRECTION OFFICER TUSCANO, (Pod Officer of F-B Pod 2-10pm shift) and CORRECTION OFFICER IMOHOFF, (Pod Officer of F-B Pod from -
Plaintiff / Appellant: AARON VAUGHN
Case Number: 20-2254
Filed: June 22, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Appellant is a prisoner and seeks to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Appellant is required to pay the full $505.00 fee in installments regardless of the outcome of the appeal. 28 U.S.C. ' 1915 (b). The Court hereby directs the warden or his or her designee to assess an initial filing fee, when funds are available, of 20% of the greater of (a) the average monthly deposits to the prisoner=s account; or (b) the average monthly balance in the prisoner=s account for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the notice of appeal. The warden, or his or her designee, shall calculate, collect, and forward the initial payment assessed in this order to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. In each succeeding month when the amount in the prisoner=s account exceeds $10.00, the warden, or his or her designee, shall forward payments to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania equaling 20% of the preceding month=s income credited to the prisoner=s account until the fees are paid. Each payment shall reference the appellate docket number for this appeal. The warden, or his or her designee, shall forward payments to the appropriate courts simultaneously if there are multiple orders. The appeal will be submitted to a panel of this court for determination under 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e)(2) as to whether the appeal will be dismissed as legally frivolous or whether summary affirmance under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 is appropriate. In making this determination, the district court opinion and record will be examined. No briefing schedule will issue until this determination is made. Although not necessary at this time, appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. Appellee need not file a response unless directed to do so or until a briefing schedule is issued. The court may reconsider in forma pauperis status at any time. Appellants motion for appointment of counsel is referred to the same panel that will consider whether the appeal should be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or whether summary action is appropriate. (LMR) [Entered: 07/23/2020 10:59 AM]
July 17, 2020 Filing 13 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Aaron Vaughn. (LMR) [Entered: 07/20/2020 02:31 PM]
July 17, 2020 Filing 12 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Aaron Vaughn. (LMR) [Entered: 07/20/2020 02:30 PM]
July 17, 2020 Filing 11 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Aaron Vaughn. (LMR) [Entered: 07/20/2020 02:29 PM]
July 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER (Clerk) It is noted that Appellants affidavit in support of the motion for leave proceed in forma pauperis was filed on July 13, 2020. Therefore, the foregoing motion is construed as a motion for leave to file documents in support of Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Appellant must file an addendum to the affidavit in support of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, a completed form authorizing assessments to be made from his prison account, and a certified six month prison account statement within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. No action will be taken on Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis until all of the required documents are filed. Should Appellant fail to file the required documents (enclosed) within the time stated, he will face dismissal of the appeal pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1 without further notice. (LMR) [Entered: 07/16/2020 01:45 PM]
July 14, 2020 Filing 9 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (ZM) [Entered: 07/14/2020 11:48 AM]
July 13, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION filed by Appellant Aaron Vaughn to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (LMR) [Entered: 07/14/2020 09:41 AM]
July 10, 2020 Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Howard G Hopkirk on behalf of Appellee(s) Correction Officer Imohoff, Sergeant Tikey, Correction Officer Gill, Correction Officer Carter, Lieutenant Schamp, Correction Officer Steckly, Correction Officer Tuscano, Correction Officer W. Perez-Ramos. [20-2254] (HGH) [Entered: 07/10/2020 03:59 PM]
July 10, 2020 Filing 6 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Timothy Mazzocca, Esq. for Gill, Schamp, Carter, Tikey, Imohoff, Steckly, Tuscano and W. Perez-Ramos requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 07/24/2020. (LMR) [Entered: 07/10/2020 10:13 AM]
July 9, 2020 Filing 5 Document in support of appeal filed by Appellant Aaron Vaughn. (LMR) [Entered: 07/10/2020 10:10 AM]
July 6, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION filed by Appellant Aaron Vaughn for Extension of Time to File for In Forma Pauperis. (LMR) [Entered: 07/10/2020 10:09 AM]
July 6, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION filed by Appellant Aaron Vaughn to appoint counsel for civil action. (LMR) [Entered: 07/10/2020 10:07 AM]
June 22, 2020 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 06/22/2020 02:18 PM]
June 22, 2020 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Aaron Vaughn in District Court No. 2-17-cv-00546. (LMR) [Entered: 06/22/2020 02:07 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Aaron Vaughn v. Imohoff, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LIEUTENANT SCHAMP, (RHU Lt. 2-10pm shift)
Represented By: Timothy Mazzocca Esq.
Represented By: Howard G. Hopkirk Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SERGEANT TIKEY, (Sgt. of F-B Pod 6 to 2am shift)
Represented By: Timothy Mazzocca Esq.
Represented By: Howard G. Hopkirk Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CORRECTION OFFICER STECKLY, (Pod Officer of F-B Pod 2-10pm shift)
Represented By: Timothy Mazzocca Esq.
Represented By: Howard G. Hopkirk Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CORRECTION OFFICER GILL
Represented By: Timothy Mazzocca Esq.
Represented By: Howard G. Hopkirk Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CORRECTION OFFICER CARTER, (Pod Officer of F-B Pod from -
Represented By: Timothy Mazzocca Esq.
Represented By: Howard G. Hopkirk Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CORRECTION OFFICER W. PEREZ-RAMOS
Represented By: Timothy Mazzocca Esq.
Represented By: Howard G. Hopkirk Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CORRECTION OFFICER TUSCANO, (Pod Officer of F-B Pod 2-10pm shift)
Represented By: Timothy Mazzocca Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CORRECTION OFFICER IMOHOFF, (Pod Officer of F-B Pod from -
Represented By: Timothy Mazzocca Esq.
Represented By: Howard G. Hopkirk Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: AARON VAUGHN
Represented By: Aaron Vaughn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?