Michael Lasche, et al v. State of New Jersey, et al
| KYLE HIGGINS, MARY LIPPENCOT, PERSONALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, KATIE EPPERLY, PERSONALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY, DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY and JANELLE CLARK |
| JENNIFER LASCHE and MICHAEL LASCHE |
| 20-2325 |
| July 1, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Michael Lasche v. State of New Jersey |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Robert J. McGuire, DAG on behalf of Appellee(s) State of New Jersey, the Division of Child Placement and Protection, Kyle Higgins, Mary Lippencot, Katie Epperly, and Janelle Clark. [20-2325] (RJM) [Entered: 08/11/2020 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Michael P. Laffey on behalf of Appellant(s) Michael Lasche, Jennifer Lasche. [20-2325] (MPL) [Entered: 07/22/2020 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 10 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Jessica Ann Jannetti, Esq. and Robert J. McGuire, Esq. for State of New Jersey, Division of Child Protection and Permanency, Kyle Higgins, Katie Epperly, Mary Lippencot and Janelle Clark requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 08/05/2020. (CJG) [Entered: 07/22/2020 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: RESPONSE filed by Appellees Janelle Clark, Division of Child Protection and Permanency, Katie Epperly, Kyle Higgins, Mary Lippencot and State of New Jersey to letter of July 1, 2020, regarding whether order is final. Certificate of Service dated 07/15/2020. Service made by ECF. [20-2325]--[Edited 07/16/2020 by TMM] (RJM) [Entered: 07/15/2020 11:49 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellants Jennifer Lasche and Michael Lasche advising this court that no transcripts are available. [20-2325] (MPL) [Entered: 07/14/2020 08:07 PM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellants Jennifer Lasche and Michael Lasche. [20-2325] (MPL) [Entered: 07/14/2020 07:58 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from MICHAEL P LAFFEY on behalf of Appellant(s) Michael Lasche, Jennifer Lasche. [20-2325] (MPL) [Entered: 07/14/2020 05:29 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellants Jennifer Lasche and Michael Lasche. [20-2325] (MPL) [Entered: 07/14/2020 05:22 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: RESPONSE by Appellants Jennifer Lasche and Michael Lasche Letter to Court's order dated July 1, 2020, addressing the issue of whether the order being appealed is final within the meaning of 28 U,S,C, 1291. Certificate of Service dated 07/14/2020. Service made by ECF, Email. [20-2325]--[Edited 07/15/2020 by TMM] (MPL) [Entered: 07/14/2020 04:30 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) The captioned appeal is from an order that dismissed all remaining claims but invited the appellants to seek leave to amend one claim. This order may not be final within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. Section 1291 or otherwise appealable. See Weber v. McGrogan, 939 F. 3d 232, 236-42 (3d Cir. 2019); Borelli v. City of Reading , 532 F. 2d 950, 951-52 (3d Cir. 1976). All parties must file written responses addressing the issue, with a certificate of service attached, within 14 days from the date of this order. (TMM) [Entered: 07/01/2020 09:18 AM]
|
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMM) [Entered: 07/01/2020 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Jennifer Lasche and Michael Lasche in District Court No. 3-18-cv-17552. (TMM) [Entered: 07/01/2020 09:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
