Ricky FritchmanIn re: Ricky Fritchman
| In re: RICKY JOSEPH FRITCHMAN |
| DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY |
| 20-2330 |
| June 29, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Mr. Ricky Joseph Fritchman requesting compliance for 2244[b] Motion Received. Compliance due within 21 days. (CLW) [Entered: 06/29/2020 07:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(b) filed. Received in the Court of Appeals on 06/26/2020. (CLW) [Entered: 06/29/2020 06:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ricky FritchmanIn re: Ricky Fritchman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY | |
| Represented By: | District Attorney Northampton County |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: RICKY JOSEPH FRITCHMAN | |
| Represented By: | Ricky Joseph Fritchman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
