H. U., et al v. Northampton Area School Distri, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: H. U. and B. U., PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF K.U., A MINOR
Defendant / Appellee: NORTHAMPTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT and COLONIAL NORTHAMPTON - IU 20
Case Number: 20-2996
Filed: September 30, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 15, 2021 H. U. v. Northampton Area School Distri

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2020 Filing 11 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from John E. Freund, III, Esquire on behalf of Appellee(s) Colonial Intermediate Unit IU20. [20-2996] (JEF) [Entered: 10/05/2020 02:57 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 10 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellants H. U. and B. U.. [20-2996] (MDS) [Entered: 10/05/2020 02:00 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 9 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellants H. U. and B. U. advising this court that transcripts are not needed. [20-2996] (MDS) [Entered: 10/05/2020 01:59 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 8 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellants B. U. and H. U.. [20-2996] (MDS) [Entered: 10/05/2020 01:58 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 7 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellants B. U. and H. U.. [20-2996] (MDS) [Entered: 10/05/2020 01:57 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Michael D. Shaffer on behalf of Appellant(s) H.U. and B.U., parents and natural guardians of K.U., a minor. [20-2996] (MDS) [Entered: 10/05/2020 01:54 PM]
October 5, 2020 Filing 5 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellants H. U. and B. U. to clerk order advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 10/05/2020. [20-2996] (MDS) [Entered: 10/05/2020 11:33 AM]
September 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER (Clerk) advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. The appellants seek review of an order granting summary judgment to one defendant. Because the claims against the other defendant were voluntarily dismissed without prejudice, this may not be a final decision under 28 U.S.C. Section: 1291 or otherwise appealable. See, e.g., Doe v. Hesketh, 828 F.3d 159, 16467 (3d Cir. 2016) ("Ordinarily, we do not have jurisdiction under Section: 1291 of an appeal in which any defendant was dismissed below by the district court without prejudice."). All parties must file written responses addressing this issue within fourteen (14) days of this order. (ARR) [Entered: 09/30/2020 10:47 PM]
September 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER (Clerk) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a)(3) (incorporated by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 25(a)(5)) and Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule 113.12(a)(2), the names of minor children must be redacted from all filings. Litigants are responsible for redacting documents. Accordingly, this appeal has been docketed under the initials of the minor appellant, rather than the minor child's full name. It appears the parties appropriately ensured the privacy of the minor child during the district-court proceedings, and it is anticipated that they will continue to do so in this appeal. All filings should be in compliance with the above-mentioned rules. The Clerk will not review each filing for compliance. Although the minor child's parents litigated under their initials during the district-court proceedings, it does not appear they ever requestedor were grantedpermission to do so. If the parents wish to continue using only initials on appeal, they must file in this Court a motion requesting such relief within fourteen (14) days of this order. Answer due 10/14/2020. (ARR) [Entered: 09/30/2020 10:35 PM]
September 30, 2020 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (ARR) [Entered: 09/30/2020 10:25 PM]
September 30, 2020 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants H. U. and B. U. in District Court No. 5-18-cv-03896. --[Edited 10/01/2020 by AWI] (ARR) [Entered: 09/30/2020 10:23 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: H. U., et al v. Northampton Area School Distri, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: H. U.
Represented By: Michael D. Shaffer Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: B. U., PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF K.U., A MINOR
Represented By: Michael D. Shaffer Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NORTHAMPTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Represented By: Julia Jacobelli Esq.
Represented By: Joseph P. Connor Esq. III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: COLONIAL NORTHAMPTON - IU 20
Represented By: John E. Freund Esq. III
Represented By: Rebecca A. Young Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?