Michael Wiggins v. Albert Einstein Medical Center, et al
| MICHAEL WIGGINS |
| LOREN MARGOTT, Human Resources, ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER, CARLA BRYANT, Employee Relations and MARK WILHELM, Director of Security |
| 20-3129 |
| October 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Michael Wiggins v. Albert Einstein Medical Center |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Albert Einstein Medical Center. [20-3129] (SKL) [Entered: 11/02/2020 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Susan K. Lessack, Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) Einstein Hospital (correct name is Albert Einstein Medical Center), Mark Wilhelm, Loren Margott and Carla Bryant. [20-3129] (SKL) [Entered: 11/02/2020 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Leigh H. McMonigle Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) Einstein Hospital (correct name is Albert Einstein Medical Center), Mark Wilhelm, Loren Margott and Carla Bryant. [20-3129] (LHM) [Entered: 11/02/2020 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Michael Wiggins due on or before 12/14/2020. Appendix due on or before 12/14/2020. (LMR) [Entered: 11/02/2020 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 10/20/2020 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Michael Wiggins in District Court No. 2-19-cv-02656. (LMR) [Entered: 10/20/2020 10:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
