LabMD Inc v. Tiversa Holding Corp, et al
| TIVERSA HOLDING CORP, FKA Tiversa Inc and ROBERT J. BOBACK |
| LABMD INC |
| MARC E. DAVIES |
| 20-3316 |
| November 12, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Marc Davies on behalf of Appellant(s) Marc Davies. [20-3316] (MED) [Entered: 12/03/2020 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 16 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant LabMD Inc in 20-3191. [20-3191, 20-3316] (MED) [Entered: 12/03/2020 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 15 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Marc E. Davies. [20-3316] (MED) [Entered: 11/26/2020 12:36 PM] |
| Filing 14 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellant Marc E. Davies to clerk order advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 11/26/2020. [20-3316] (MED) [Entered: 11/26/2020 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 13 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Marc E. Davies. [20-3316] (MED) [Entered: 11/26/2020 12:23 AM] |
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Marc E. Davies advising this court that transcripts are not needed. [20-3316] (MED) [Entered: 11/26/2020 12:11 AM] |
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Marc Davies on behalf of Appellant(s) Marc Davies. [20-3316] (MED) [Entered: 11/25/2020 11:58 PM] |
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: LETTER on behalf of Appellee Robert J. Boback. Appellee Robert J. Boback will adopt the Response to Order Regarding Appellate Jurisdiction on behalf of Appellee Tiversa Holding Corp. Certificate of Service dated 11/25/2020.Service made by ECF. This document will be SENT TO THE MERITS PANEL if/when applicable. [20-3316] (BJV) [Entered: 11/25/2020 07:30 PM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Brandon J. Verdream on behalf of Appellee(s) Robert J. Boback. [20-3316] (BJV) [Entered: 11/25/2020 07:28 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee Tiversa Holding Corp to clerk order. Certificate of Service dated 11/25/2020. [20-3316] (NLZ) [Entered: 11/25/2020 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Tiversa Holding Corp. [20-3316] (NLZ) [Entered: 11/25/2020 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Natalie L. Zagari on behalf of Appellee(s) Tiversa Holding Corp.. [20-3316] (NLZ) [Entered: 11/25/2020 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jarrod D. Shaw on behalf of Appellee(s) Tiversa Holding Corp.. [20-3316] (JDS) [Entered: 11/25/2020 02:22 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) Appellant Marc Davies, Esq., has appealed an order, entered during ongoing postjudgment litigation, that denied his motion to withdraw as counsel for the plaintiff. Appellants motion claimed the plaintiff does not have the funds to pay [him] for the additional legal services involving remaining issues before [the district court]. This order may not be a final decision[] under 28 U.S.C. 1291 or otherwise appealable. Compare United States v. Bertoli, 994 F.2d 1002, 101014 (3d Cir. 1993), with United States v. Bellille, 962 F.3d 731, 73538 (3d Cir. 2020) (finding appellate jurisdiction over order denying withdrawal sought on ethical grounds), and Ohntrup v. Firearms Ctr., Inc., 802 F.2d 676, 678 (3d Cir. 1986). All parties must file written responses addressing these issues within fourteen (14) days of this order. (LMR) [Entered: 11/12/2020 03:37 PM]
|
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 11/12/2020 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Marc E. Davies in District Court No. 4632978. (LMR) [Entered: 11/12/2020 03:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
