Patricia Wharwood, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, et al
MICHAEL RUSSELL, a/k/a John Doe |
RICHARD CONCEPCION |
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY and WELLS FARGO BANK NA |
PATRICIA WHARWOOD |
20-3449 |
December 7, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Patricia Wharwood v. Wells Fargo Bank NA |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ECF FILER: RESPONSE TO THE JANUARY 11, 2021 NOTICE OF POSSIBLE JURISDICTIONAL DEFECT filed by Appellee Federal Housing Finance Agency. Certificate of Service dated 02/01/2021. Service made by ECF, US mail. [20-3449] (SFS) [Entered: 02/01/2021 08:46 AM] |
Filing 6 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (SH) [Entered: 01/11/2021 10:59 AM] |
Filing 5 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Wells Fargo Bank NA. [20-3449] (HFR) [Entered: 12/14/2020 03:41 PM] |
Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Henry F. Reichner on behalf of Appellee(s) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. [20-3449] (HFR) [Entered: 12/14/2020 03:40 PM] |
Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Sarah Fehm Stewart on behalf of Appellee(s) Federal Housing Finance Agency. [20-3449] (SFS) [Entered: 12/10/2020 03:32 PM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 12/07/2020 09:37 AM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Patricia Wharwood in District Court No. 2-19-cv-16590. (LMR) [Entered: 12/07/2020 09:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.