Aidong Chen v. KPMG LLP, et al
| SIMON PHILLIPS, KPMG LLP, DAVID HALIK and WILLIAM KOCH |
| AIDONG CHEN |
| 21-1014 |
| January 5, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Aidong Chen to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal [ # 3 ]. (LMR) [Entered: 02/09/2021 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: LETTER from Attorney Peter O. Hughes, Esq. for Appellees David Halik, William Koch, KPMG LLP and Simon Phillips Argument in Support of Dismissal of Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction, responding to Clerk's letter of January 28, 2021. Certificate of Service dated 01/29/2021. Service made by ECF, Email. [21-1014] (POH) [Entered: 01/29/2021 11:52 AM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Aidong Chen for adjusting filing date and a Response to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 01/20/2021. Service made by US mail. (LMR) [Entered: 02/01/2021 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 6 Notice received from the district court that the docketing and filing fees were paid by the appellant on 01/14/2021. (LMR) [Entered: 01/26/2021 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Peter O. Hughes on behalf of Appellee(s) KPMG LLP, William Koch, David Halik, Simon Phillips. [21-1014] (POH) [Entered: 01/11/2021 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee KPMG LLP. [21-1014] (POH) [Entered: 01/11/2021 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (ZM) [Entered: 01/08/2021 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 01/05/2021 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Aidong Chen in District Court No. 2-18-cv-12650. (AMR) [Entered: 01/05/2021 01:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
