Reinard Smith v. Dara Khosrowshahi, et al
| BARNEY HARFORD, DARA KHOSROWSHAHI, UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC, GARRETT CAMP and TRAVIS KALANICK |
| REINARD SMITH |
| 21-1072 |
| January 13, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Brief Received from Appellant Reinard Smith. As no briefing schedule has yet issued, the brief is construed as a document in support of the appeal. If after disposition of the pending motions the appeal is to proceed to briefing, the parties will be advised regarding the filing date of this brief and the date for filing a responsive brief. (JK) [Entered: 02/19/2021 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Uber Technologies Inc. [21-1072] (PCL) [Entered: 01/26/2021 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Paul C. Lantis on behalf of Appellee(s) Uber Technologies, Inc.. [21-1072] (PCL) [Entered: 01/26/2021 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Aaron J. Creuz on behalf of Appellee(s) Uber Technologies, inc.. [21-1072] (AJC) [Entered: 01/26/2021 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (SH) [Entered: 01/22/2021 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 01/13/2021 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Reinard Smith in District Court No. 2-19-cv-04242. (AMR) [Entered: 01/13/2021 03:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
