Jay Lin, et al v. Hudson City Savings Bank, et al
| PARKER MCCAY, PA, M&T BANK and HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK |
| IRENE H. LIN, on behalf of themselves and all others similalry situated and JAY J. LIN |
| 21-1189 |
| February 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellants Irene H. Lin and Mr. Jay J. Lin to clerk order advising of possible dismissal, clerk order. Certificate of Service dated 03/16/2021. [21-1189] (JJL) [Entered: 03/16/2021 10:11 AM] |
Filing 20
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion for extension of time filed by Appellants Mr. Jay J. Lin and Irene H. Lin. Appellants' response to the February 2, 2021 Clerk's Order listing the case for possible dismissal must be filed on or before March 16, 2021. (JK) [Entered: 03/11/2021 01:31 PM]
|
| Filing 19 ECF FILER: LETTER on behalf of Appellee Parker McCay. Appellee Parker McCay will adopt the Response filed by Appellees Hudson City Savings Bank and M&T Bank to clerk order advising of possible dismissal filed on February 16, 2021. on behalf of Appellees Hudson City Savings Bank and M&T Bank. Certificate of Service dated 03/03/2021.Service made by ECF. This document will be SENT TO THE MERITS PANEL if/when applicable. [21-1189] (ACS) [Entered: 03/03/2021 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 18 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellants Irene H. Lin and Mr. Jay J. Lin to for Extension of Time to file Request of Extension of time to file Response to Order. until/for 14 days and a Response to clerk order, clerk order. Certificate of Service dated 03/02/2021. Service made by ECF. [21-1189] (JJL) [Entered: 03/02/2021 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 17 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Andrew Christopher Sayles on behalf of Appellee(s) Parker McCay, P.A.. [21-1189] (ACS) [Entered: 03/01/2021 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 16 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellants Irene H. Lin and Mr. Jay J. Lin advising this court that transcripts are not needed. [21-1189] (JJL) [Entered: 03/01/2021 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 15 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellants Irene H. Lin and Mr. Jay J. Lin. [21-1189] (JJL) [Entered: 03/01/2021 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 14 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellants Irene H. Lin and Mr. Jay J. Lin. [21-1189] (JJL) [Entered: 03/01/2021 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 13 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellants Irene H. Lin and Mr. Jay J. Lin. [21-1189] (JJL) [Entered: 03/01/2021 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jay J. Lin, Esq. on behalf of Appellant(s) Jay Lin, Irene Lin, and all others similar situated.. [21-1189] (JJL) [Entered: 03/01/2021 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 11 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Andrew C. Sayles, Esq. for Parker McCay requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 03/04/2021. (JK) [Entered: 02/18/2021 12:42 PM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion for extension of time filed by Appellants Mr. Jay J. Lin and Irene H. Lin. Appellants' response to the February 2, 2021 Clerk's Order listing the case for possible dismissal must be filed on or before March 2, 2021. Appellants are advised, however, that future motions must state "with particularity the grounds for the motion, the relief sought, and the legal argument necessary to support it." See Fed. R. App. P. 27(a)(2)(A). Appellants are also advised that the response should address the jurisdictional issue raised in the February 2, 2021 Clerk's Order. The response is not a brief on the merits of the appeal. A briefing and scheduling order will not issue until the jurisdictional issue has been addressed. Further, on or before March 2, 2021, counsel for Appellants must also file the following forms: 1) Appearance Form; 2) Civil Information Statement; 3) Disclosure Statement; 4) Concise Summary of the Case; and 5) Transcript Purchase Order Form. Failure to file these forms will result in dismissal of the case without further notice. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 107.2. (JK) [Entered: 02/18/2021 12:36 PM]
|
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellees Hudson City Savings Bank and M&T Bank to clerk order advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 02/16/2021. [21-1189] (FWH) [Entered: 02/16/2021 09:41 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellees Hudson City Savings Bank and M&T Bank. [21-1189] (FWH) [Entered: 02/16/2021 09:35 PM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Fred W. Hoensch on behalf of Appellee(s) Hudson City Savings Bank and M&T Bank. [21-1189] (FWH) [Entered: 02/16/2021 09:28 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Scott W. Parker on behalf of Appellee(s) Hudson City Savings Bank and M&T Bank. [21-1189] (SWP) [Entered: 02/16/2021 09:25 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from James P. Berg on behalf of Appellee(s) Hudson City Savings Bank and M&T Bank. [21-1189] (JPB) [Entered: 02/16/2021 09:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellants Irene H. Lin and Mr. Jay J. Lin for 14 Day Extension of Time to file Response to Clerk Order. Certificate of Service dated 02/16/2021. Service made by ECF. [21-1189]--[Edited 02/16/2021 by CJG] (JJL) [Entered: 02/16/2021 10:06 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (AMR) [Entered: 02/02/2021 09:33 AM]
|
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 02/02/2021 09:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Irene H. Lin and Mr. Jay J. Lin in District Court No. 3-18-cv-15387. (AMR) [Entered: 02/02/2021 09:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
