Luis Clark v. Superintendent Retreat SCI, et al
Defendant / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and SUPERINTENDENT RETREAT SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant: LUIS M. CLARK
Case Number: 21-1339
Filed: February 24, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 7, 2022 Luis Clark v. Superintendent Retreat SCI

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion for appointment of counsel is granted. Third Circuit Internal Operating Procedure 10.3.2 provides for the appointment of counsel upon the granting of a certificate of appealability provided the party is indigent. As Appellant has been granted indigent status, counsel will be appointed to represent him in this appeal. The parties will be notified when counsel has been appointed. (CND) [Entered: 03/02/2021 09:22 AM]
February 25, 2021 Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Elizabeth R. McFarlan on behalf of Respondent(s) AG State of Delaware; Superintendent S.C.I Retreat. [21-1339] (ERM) [Entered: 02/25/2021 10:10 AM]
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Court may reconsider in forma pauperis status or request additional information at any time during the course of these proceedings. Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is referred to a motions panel. (CND) [Entered: 02/24/2021 03:21 PM]
February 24, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION filed by Appellant Luis M. Clark for Appointment of Counsel. Response due on 03/08/2021. Service made by Clerk's Office on 02/24/2021 through ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 02/24/2021 02:27 PM]
February 24, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION filed by Appellant Luis M. Clark to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 03/08/2021.Service made by Clerk's Office on 02/24/2021 through ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 02/24/2021 02:20 PM]
February 24, 2021 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 02/24/2021 02:00 PM]
February 24, 2021 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Luis M. Clark in District Court No. 1-19-cv-01976. (AMR) [Entered: 02/24/2021 01:47 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Luis Clark v. Superintendent Retreat SCI, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Represented By: Elizabeth R. McFarlan Esq.
Represented By: Andrew J. Vella Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SUPERINTENDENT RETREAT SCI
Represented By: Elizabeth R. McFarlan Esq.
Represented By: Andrew J. Vella Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: LUIS M. CLARK
Represented By: Luis M. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?