Lee Williams v. Tech Mahindra Americas Inc
| LEE WILLIAMS, individually and in his representative capacity |
| TECH MAHINDRA AMERICAS INC |
| 21-1394 |
| March 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Williams v. Tech Mahindra (Americas) Inc.
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 TEXT ONLY ORDER (Clerk) granting Appellant's motion for extension of time to file brief and appendix until 05/26/2021. Counsel is advised to review the Court's Notice of October 15, 2012 advising that extensions of time are disfavored [21-1365, 21-1394] (KAG) [Entered: 04/21/2021 05:44 PM] |
| Filing 18 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Lee Williams in 21-1365, 21-1394 to for Extension of Time to file Appellant Brief until/for 30 days and a Response to clerk order Clerk/Court Order Unrestrict. Certificate of Service dated 04/19/2021. Service made by Email. [21-1365, 21-1394] (DK) [Entered: 04/19/2021 06:14 PM] |
| Filing 17 ECF FILER: WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Brian M. Hayes, Esq. for Appellee Tech Mahindra Americas Inc in 21-1365 & 21-1394 Certificate of Service dated 04/02/2021. Service made by ECF. [21-1365, 21-1394]--[Edited 04/02/2021 by CJG] (BMH) [Entered: 04/02/2021 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 16 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Lee Williams due on or before 04/26/2021. Appendix due on or before 04/26/2021. [21-1365, 21-1394] (PDB) [Entered: 03/17/2021 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 15 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Lee Williams in 21-1365, 21-1394 advising this court that no transcripts are available. [21-1365, 21-1394] (DK) [Entered: 03/12/2021 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 14 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Lee Williams in 21-1365, 21-1394. [21-1365, 21-1394] (DK) [Entered: 03/12/2021 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 13 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Lee Williams in 21-1365, 21-1394. [21-1365, 21-1394] (DK) [Entered: 03/12/2021 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Lee Williams in 21-1365, 21-1394. [21-1365, 21-1394] (DK) [Entered: 03/12/2021 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Daniel Kotchen on behalf of Appellant(s) Lee Williams. [21-1365, 21-1394] (DK) [Entered: 03/12/2021 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Kenneth W. Gage on behalf of Appellee(s) Tech Mahindra (Americas), Inc.--[Edited 03/12/2021 by SLC] (KG) [Entered: 03/12/2021 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Tech Mahindra Americas Inc in 21-1365.--[Edited 03/12/2021 by SLC] (KG) [Entered: 03/12/2021 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Brian M. Hayes on behalf of Appellee(s) Tech Mahindra (Americas), Inc. [-WITHDRAWN 04/02/21.]--[Edited 04/02/2021 by CJG] (BMH) [Entered: 03/12/2021 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Julia G. Mix on behalf of Appellee(s) Tech Mahindra (Americas), Inc.. [21-1365, 21-1394] (JGM) [Entered: 03/12/2021 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 3 CLERK ORDER consolidating the appeals at Nos. 21-1365 and 21-1394 for all purposes. The parties are advised that all case-opening forms, motions, and briefs must be electronically filed in all cases on the Courts electronic case filing (ECF) system, filed. [21-1394, 21-1365] (PDB) [Entered: 03/02/2021 08:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 03/02/2021 08:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Lee Williams in District Court No. 3-20-cv-04684. (PDB) [Entered: 03/02/2021 08:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
