Michael Lutz v. Portfolio Recovery Associates
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC |
MICHAEL LUTZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
21-1656 |
April 7, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
![]() |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Michael Lutz due on or before 06/09/2021. Appendix due on or before 06/09/2021. (JK) [Entered: 04/30/2021 12:33 PM] |
Filing 12 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jarrod D. Shaw on behalf of Appellee(s) Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC. [21-1656] (JDS) [Entered: 04/22/2021 09:07 AM] |
Filing 11 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Kevin Tucker on behalf of Appellant(s) Michael Lutz. [21-1656] (KWT) [Entered: 04/21/2021 01:01 PM] |
Filing 10 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Michael Lutz advising this court that no transcripts are available. [21-1656] (KJA) [Entered: 04/21/2021 12:46 PM] |
Filing 9 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Michael Lutz. [21-1656] (KJA) [Entered: 04/21/2021 12:44 PM] |
Filing 8 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Michael Lutz. [21-1656] (KJA) [Entered: 04/21/2021 12:43 PM] |
Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Kevin Abramowicz on behalf of Appellant(s) Michael Lutz. [21-1656] (KJA) [Entered: 04/21/2021 12:41 PM] |
Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Tammy L. Adkins on behalf of Appellee(s) Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC. [21-1656] (TLA) [Entered: 04/20/2021 03:16 PM] |
Filing 5 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC. [21-1656] (DLH) [Entered: 04/20/2021 02:00 PM] |
Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from David L. Hartsell on behalf of Appellee(s) Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC. [21-1656] (DLH) [Entered: 04/20/2021 01:56 PM] |
Filing 3 Appendix Citation Notice sent to Kevin J. Abramowicz, Esq., Kevin W. Tucker, Esq., Tammy L. Adkins, Esq., Amy Gilbert, Esq., David L. Hartsell, Esq., Jarrod D. Shaw, Esq.. If unable to comply you must respond on or before 04/21/2021. (JK) [Entered: 04/07/2021 03:55 PM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 04/07/2021 03:53 PM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Michael Lutz in District Court No. 2-20-cv-00676. (JK) [Entered: 04/07/2021 03:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Michael Lutz v. Portfolio Recovery Associates | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC | |
Represented By: | Amy Gilbert Esq. |
Represented By: | David L. Hartsell Esq. |
Represented By: | Jarrod D. Shaw Esq. |
Represented By: | Tammy L. Adkins Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: MICHAEL LUTZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated | |
Represented By: | Kevin J. Abramowicz Esq. |
Represented By: | Kevin W. Tucker Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.