USA v. Nathan Mosley
Defendant / Appellant: NATHAN MOSLEY, a/k/a Nate
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 21-1785
Filed: April 23, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2021 Filing 13 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Nathan Mosley for issuance of certificate of appealability. Certificate of Service dated 05/18/2021. Service made by ECF, US mail. [21-1785] (FWU) [Entered: 05/18/2021 01:31 PM]
May 11, 2021 Filing 12 ECF FILER: TRANSCRIPT PURCHASE ORDER (Part III) filed by Wendy C. Yinger for the date(s) of Change of Plea on 6/24/2014. Transcripts were filed in the District Court on 05/11/2021. [21-1785] (WCY) [Entered: 05/11/2021 02:50 PM]
May 11, 2021 Filing 11 ECF FILER: TRANSCRIPT PURCHASE ORDER (Part II) filed by Wendy C. Yinger for date(s) of Change of Plea on 6/24/2014. [21-1785] (WCY) [Entered: 05/11/2021 02:49 PM]
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER to Court Reporter Wendy C. Yinger directing transcripts, ordered on 05/07/2021 , to be filed by 06/09/2021. (AMR) [Entered: 05/07/2021 11:25 AM]
May 7, 2021 Filing 9 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Nathan Mosley advising this court that transcripts are needed. Requested date(s) are: Change of Plea (6/24/2014), to be filed by Wendy C. Yinger. [21-1785] (FWU) [Entered: 05/07/2021 09:26 AM]
May 7, 2021 Filing 8 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Nathan Mosley. [21-1785] (FWU) [Entered: 05/07/2021 09:25 AM]
May 7, 2021 Filing 7 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Nathan Mosley. [21-1785] (FWU) [Entered: 05/07/2021 09:24 AM]
May 7, 2021 Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Frederick W. Ulrich on behalf of Appellant(s) Nathan Mosley. [21-1785] (FWU) [Entered: 05/07/2021 09:23 AM]
April 27, 2021 Filing 5 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (ZM) [Entered: 04/27/2021 02:32 PM]
April 26, 2021 Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Daryl F. Bloom on behalf of Appellee(s) United States of America. [21-1785] (DFB) [Entered: 04/26/2021 10:08 AM]
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER (Clerk) appointing FPD to represent Appellant Nathan Mosley. (AMR) [Entered: 04/23/2021 10:21 AM]
April 23, 2021 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 04/23/2021 10:20 AM]
April 23, 2021 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Nathan Mosley in District Court No. 1-14-cr-00015-003. (AMR) [Entered: 04/23/2021 10:17 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Nathan Mosley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: NATHAN MOSLEY, a/k/a Nate
Represented By: Frederick W. Ulrich Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Daryl F. Bloom Esq.
Represented By: Eric Pfisterer Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?