Kevin Quevi v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
Defendant / Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEVIN RICHARD QUEVI
Case Number: 21-1788
Filed: April 22, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2021 Filing 8 ECF FILER: Sean A. Kirkpatrick NOT PARTICIPATING: Appellee Attorney General Pennsylvania will not participate in this appeal, received. [21-1788] (SAK) [Entered: 05/21/2021 02:54 PM]
May 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing letter is construed as a motion for extension of time to file an application for certificate of appealability. So construed, no action will be taken on the motion. It is noted that Appellant's application for a certificate of appealability is filed as of May 11, 2021. (SLC) [Entered: 05/13/2021 02:00 PM]
May 11, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Richard Quevi for Certificate of Appealability. Response due on 05/24/2021. Certificate of Service dated 05/07/2021. Service made by US mail. (SLC) [Entered: 05/11/2021 01:50 PM]
May 7, 2021 Filing 5 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Ronald Eisenberg, Esq. for Attorney General Pennsylvania requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 05/21/2021. (SLC) [Entered: 05/07/2021 02:27 PM]
May 4, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Richard Quevi for extension of time to file a certificate of appealability. Response due on 05/14/2021. Clerk's Office made service on 05/04/2021. Service made by ECF. (SLC) [Entered: 05/04/2021 02:48 PM]
April 28, 2021 Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (SH) [Entered: 04/28/2021 02:23 PM]
April 22, 2021 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 04/22/2021 03:27 PM]
April 22, 2021 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Richard Quevi in District Court No. 1-21-cv-00514. (AMR) [Entered: 04/22/2021 03:17 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kevin Quevi v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: Ronald Eisenberg Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: KEVIN RICHARD QUEVI
Represented By: Kevin Richard Quevi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?