Christopher Ellington v. Sable Vance, et al
| CONNECTIONS CSP INC, of Delaware, MINDY BACKUS, SABLE VANCE and LAWRENCE KIRBY |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| CHRISTOPHER M. ELLINGTON |
| 21-1910 |
| May 12, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Christopher Ellington v. Sable Vance |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER (Clerk) dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1(a), for failure to pay the filing fee for the notice of appeal. Case terminated on 07/06/2021. (LMR) [Entered: 07/06/2021 11:47 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion is referred to the same panel of the Court that will consider whether to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. (LMR) [Entered: 06/24/2021 08:20 AM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant Christopher M. Ellington for oral argument. (LMR) [Entered: 06/24/2021 08:18 AM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (ZM) [Entered: 05/25/2021 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Shamoor Anis on behalf of Appellee(s) United States of America. [21-1910] (SA) [Entered: 05/20/2021 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 05/12/2021 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Christopher M. Ellington in District Court No. 1-20-cv-01100. (LMR) [Entered: 05/12/2021 09:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
