Steven Lundy v. Pocono Mountain Regional, et al
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA |
JUDGE JONATHAN MARK, MONROE COUNTY COURTHOUSE DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONROE COUNTY, 1ST ASSISTANT DA MICHAEL MANCUSO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY E. DAVID CHRISTINE, JR., PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, WARDEN GARY HAIDEL, DETECTIVE SERGEANT KENNETH E. LENNING, III, DETECTIVE CORPORAL LUCAS DAVID BRAY, JUDGE ARTHUR L. ZULICK, ASSISTANT DA CATHERINE THERESA PIROLLI, CORPORAL OFFICER MATTHEW NERO, MONROE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and POCONO MOUNTAIN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT |
STEVEN LOVE LUNDY, a/k/a "Divine: Rose" |
21-1957 |
May 18, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant Steven Love Lundy to Amend Case Caption with request for Appellant's mail to be sent elsewhere. Response due on 07/19/2021. Clerk's Office made service on 07/08/2021. Service made by ECF. (SLC) [Entered: 07/08/2021 10:00 AM] |
Filing 4 ECF FILER: NOT PARTICIPATING: Sean A. Kirkpatrick, Esq. for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania will not participate in this appeal, received. [21-1957] (SAK) [Entered: 05/18/2021 11:58 AM] |
Filing 3 Document in Support of Appeal. Clerks's Office made service on 05/18/2021. Service made by ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 05/18/2021 10:22 AM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 05/18/2021 10:20 AM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Steven Love Lundy in District Court No. 3-20-cv-01898. (AMR) [Entered: 05/18/2021 10:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.