Antwan Richardson v. Joseph Hartye, et al
| ANTWAN L. RICHARDSON |
| JOSEPH F. HARTYE, BRADLEY A. WINNICK, JOHN R. CANAVAN, DAUPHIN COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY, JUDGE DEBORAH E. CURCILLO and FRANCIS T. CHARDO |
| 21-2429 |
| August 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Antwan Richardson v. Joseph Hartye |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION filed by Appellant Antwan L. Richardson for Appointment of Counsel. Certificate of Service dated 09/26/2021. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 09/30/2021 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 12 Argument In Support of Appeal filed by Appellant Antwan Richardson. Certificate of Service dated 09/26/2021. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 09/30/2021 11:23 AM] |
Filing 11
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Antwan L. Richardson. The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. (TMM) [Entered: 09/14/2021 09:43 AM]
|
| Filing 9 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Antwan L. Richardson. (TMM) [Entered: 09/08/2021 07:54 AM] |
| Filing 8 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Antwan L. Richardson. (TMM) [Entered: 09/08/2021 07:54 AM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Antwan L. Richardson to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 08/16/2021. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 09/08/2021 07:53 AM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion for extension of time to file for IFP filed by Appellant Antwan L. Richardson is granted. Appellant must either pay the district court the entire docketing and filing fee of $505.00 or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, along with an addendum to the affidavit in support of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, a completed form authorizing assessments to be made from his prison account, and a certified prison account statement within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Should Appellant fail to either pay the fees or file the motion within the time stated, he will face dismissal of the appeal pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1 without further notice. (TMM) [Entered: 09/03/2021 07:23 AM]
|
| Filing 10 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Antwan L. Richardson. (TMM) [Entered: 09/08/2021 07:55 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant Antwan L. Richardson for Extension of Time to File for In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 08/14/2021. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 08/18/2021 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 4 Certified copy of duplicate notice of appeal filed in the district court on 08/09/2021 received from Clerk of District Court. (TMM) [Entered: 08/16/2021 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certified copy of duplicate notice of appeal filed in the district court on 08/09/2021 received from Clerk of District Court. (SB) [Entered: 08/09/2021 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMM) [Entered: 08/02/2021 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Antwan L. Richardson in District Court No. 1-19-cv-02132. (TMM) [Entered: 08/02/2021 11:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
