Wilkyn Almonte-Camacho v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
WILKYN ALMONTE-CAMACHO |
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY |
21-2474 |
August 12, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Wilkyn Almonte-Camacho due on or before 10/18/2021. Appendix due on or before 10/18/2021. (LMR) [Entered: 09/08/2021 06:58 PM] |
Filing 13 COMPLIANCE RECEIVED. Entry of Appearance received from Appellant Wilkyn Almonte-Camacho. (LMR) [Entered: 09/08/2021 06:54 PM] |
Filing 12 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Owolabi Salis on behalf of Appellant(s) Wilkyn Almonte-Camacho. [21-2474] (OS) [Entered: 09/08/2021 06:28 PM] |
Filing 11 ORDER (HARDIMAN and RESTREPO, Circuit Judges) denying emergency motion to stay of action and release filed by Appellant Wilkyn Almonte-Camacho. Panel No.: ELD-021-E. HARDIMAN, Authoring Judge. (JK) [Entered: 09/03/2021 07:01 PM] |
Filing 10 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellees Hudson County Correctional Facility, Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Department of Homeland Security to motion to stay removal. Certificate of Service dated 09/03/2021. [21-2474] (JAD) [Entered: 09/03/2021 05:34 PM] |
Filing 9 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Joseph A. Darrow on behalf of Respondent(s) Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security; Warden, Hudson County Correctional Facility. [21-2474] (JAD) [Entered: 09/03/2021 01:15 PM] |
Filing 8 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Enes Hajdarpasic, Esq. for Hudson County Correctional Facility, Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Department of Homeland Security and J. Andrew Ruymann, Esq. for Hudson County Correctional Facility, Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Department of Homeland Security requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 09/10/2021. (JK) [Entered: 09/03/2021 12:48 PM] |
Filing 7 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Appellant Wilkyn Almonte-Camacho requesting Entry of Appearance. Compliance due 09/07/2021. (JK) [Entered: 09/03/2021 12:32 PM] |
Filing 6 EMERGENCY MOTION filed by Appellant Wilkyn Almonte-Camacho to Stay Removal. Response due on 09/16/2021. Certificate of Service dated 09/01/2021. Service made by US mail. (JK) [Entered: 09/03/2021 12:29 PM] |
Filing 5 ORDER (Clerk) No action will be taken on the motion for release pending appeal. It was submitted and signed by the appellant's wife, who is not a party to this appeal and does not appear to be an attorney licensed to practice law before this Court. "[A] non-attorney may not represent other parties in federal court." Murray v. City of Phila., 901 F.3d 169, 170 (3d Cir. 2018). This order does not prevent the appellant from filing a new motion for release that is signed by him personally (or by an attorney representing him). See Fed. R. App. P. 32(d); 3d Cir. L.A.R. 46.4 (2011). (JK) [Entered: 08/27/2021 02:06 PM] |
Filing 3 Notice received from the district court that the docketing and filing fees were paid by the appellant on 08/27/2021. (JK) [Entered: 08/27/2021 01:55 PM] |
Filing 4 DOCUMENT filed by Appellant Wilkyn Almonte-Camacho titled Order to Show Cause, construed as a Motion for Release Pending Appeal. (JK) [Entered: 08/27/2021 02:03 PM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 08/12/2021 05:34 PM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Wilkyn Almonte-Camacho in District Court No. 2-21-cv-13763. (JK) [Entered: 08/12/2021 05:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.