In re: Charles Bellon
| In re: CHARLES BELLON |
| TAMMY FERGUSON, Superintendent of SCI Benner Township, JOSHUA D. SHAPIRO, individually and in his official capacity as Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Attorney General, CHRISTOPHER D. SCHMIDT, individually and in his official capacity as County of Blair Deputy Attorney General and KEITH A. PESTO |
| 21-2638 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Charles Bellon requesting Action on the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby deferred. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis submitted with the mandamus petition was not sufficiently complete for the Court to rule on at this time. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, Petitioner must file a compliant motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, which includes this Courts affidavit of poverty and a statement of the petitioners institutional account for the prior six months. No action will be taken on the filings unless all these deficiencies are corrected. If they are not corrected by the deadline, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. Compliance due 09/16/2021. (SB) [Entered: 09/02/2021 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioner Charles Bellon to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 09/13/2021. Certificate of Service dated 08/31/2021. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 09/02/2021 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. (SB) [Entered: 09/02/2021 11:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
