USA v. Yasheam Washington
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| YASHEAM WASHINGTON |
| 21-2740 |
| September 17, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) It is noted that Appellant chose to waive his right to counsel and proceed pro se in the District Court. The District Court appointed the Federal Public Defender as stand-by counsel. Appellant is hereby advised that unlike proceedings in District Court, there is no right to proceed pro se on appeal. This Court in its discretion may permit an appellant to proceed pro se if an appellant knowingly and voluntarily waives the right to counsel. As such, Appellant is hereby advised of the potential dangers and disadvantages of proceeding pro se on appeal. Appellant must make his election known to the Clerk by filing the waiver of counsel form or by filing a written statement accepting representation by the Federal Public Defender within 14 days of the date of this order. The Federal Public Defender has been appointed as counsel for Appellant until such time as Appellant informs the Clerk of his choice. In the event Appellant fails to respond to this Order, it will be presumed that Appellant has chosen to be represented by the Federal Public Defender. (CJG) [Entered: 09/17/2021 01:54 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER (Clerk) appointing FPD to represent Appellant Yasheam Washington. (CJG) [Entered: 09/17/2021 01:49 PM]
|
| Filing 1 CRIMINAL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Yasheam Washington in District Court No. 2-19-cr-00291-001. (CJG) [Entered: 09/17/2021 01:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
