Shaun Rushing v. US District Court Western Dist
US DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT KALLOMAZOO |
SHAUN RUSHING |
21-2761 |
September 23, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 09/28/2021 02:30 PM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 09/23/2021 01:21 PM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Shaun Rushing in District Court No. 3-21-cv-14556. (JK) [Entered: 09/23/2021 01:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Shaun Rushing v. US District Court Western Dist | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: SHAUN RUSHING | |
Represented By: | Shaun Rushing |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: US DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT KALLOMAZOO | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.