USA v. Kevin Watson
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| KEVIN WATSON |
| 21-2785 |
| September 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER (Clerk) The above docketed appeals are hereby consolidated for all purposes. The parties are advised that all case opening forms, motions, and briefs, if a briefing schedule issues, must be electronically filed in all cases on the Court's electronic case filing (ECF) system. It is noted that Appellant chose to waive his right to counsel and proceed pro se in the District Court. Appellant is hereby advised that unlike proceedings in District Court, there is no right to proceed pro se on appeal. It is noted that Appellant seeks review of two District Court orders entered September 15, 2021, denying various pre-trial motions. The orders on appeal are not final and are not otherwise appealable at this time. See Flanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259, 263 (1984). If Appellant elects to waive counsel and proceed pro se, Appellant must file and serve a written response addressing this Court's authority over the appeals, with a certificate of service attached, within fourteen (14) days of the filing of the waiver form. If Appellant elects to accept representation by Mark A. Sindler, Esq., or if Appellant fails to respond to this Order, then Mark A. Sindler, Esq. must file and serve a written response addressing this Court's authority over the appeals within fourteen (14) days of either the filing of Appellant's written statement accepting representation or the expiration of Appellant's response time, whichever occurs first. Appellee's response addressing this Court's authority over these appeals must be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. [21-2786, 21-2785] (PDB) [Entered: 09/28/2021 06:56 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Certified Copy of Supplemental Notice of Appeal filed 09/21/2021 received from Clerk of District Court. (PDB) [Entered: 09/28/2021 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 5 Certified Copy of Supplemental Notice of Appeal filed 09/21/2021 received from Clerk of District Court. (PDB) [Entered: 09/28/2021 04:36 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER appointing , Esq. as CJA counsel to represent. ORDER appointing Mark A. Sindler, Esq. as CJA counsel to represent Appellant Kevin Watson. (PDB) [Entered: 09/28/2021 04:27 PM]
|
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 09/28/2021 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 CRIMINAL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Kevin Watson in District Court No. 2-19-cr-00203-001. (PDB) [Entered: 09/28/2021 04:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Kevin Watson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Laura S. Irwin Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: KEVIN WATSON | |
| Represented By: | Mark A. Sindler Esq. |
| Represented By: | Kevin Watson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
