Jonathan Pena v. Kevin Clark, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: JONATHAN PENA
Defendant / Appellee: KEVIN CLARK, T. WATERS and A. FRITZINGER
Case Number: 21-2931
Filed: October 18, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 28, 2022 Jonathan Pena v. Kevin Clark

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Jonathan Pena. The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. (AMR) [Entered: 12/02/2021 12:08 PM]
November 24, 2021 Filing 7 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Jonathan Pena. (AMR) [Entered: 11/26/2021 08:59 AM]
November 22, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Jonathan Pena to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 12/02/2021. Certificate of Service dated 11/18/2021. Service made by US mail. (AMR) [Entered: 11/26/2021 08:53 AM]
November 1, 2021 Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Howard G Hopkirk on behalf of Appellee(s) KEVIN CLARK, T. WATERS, and A. FRITZINGER. [21-2931] (HGH) [Entered: 11/01/2021 07:07 PM]
October 27, 2021 Filing 4 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Jonathan Pena. (AMR) [Entered: 10/27/2021 03:04 PM]
October 27, 2021 Filing 3 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Jonathan Pena. (AMR) [Entered: 10/27/2021 03:02 PM]
October 18, 2021 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 10/18/2021 03:27 PM]
October 18, 2021 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Jonathan Pena in District Court No. 3-19-cv-01536. (AMR) [Entered: 10/18/2021 03:20 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jonathan Pena v. Kevin Clark, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JONATHAN PENA
Represented By: Jonathan Pena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KEVIN CLARK
Represented By: Jonathan M. Blake Esq.
Represented By: Howard G. Hopkirk Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: T. WATERS
Represented By: Jonathan M. Blake Esq.
Represented By: Howard G. Hopkirk Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: A. FRITZINGER
Represented By: Jonathan M. Blake Esq.
Represented By: Howard G. Hopkirk Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?