H. Gurvey, et al v. M&T Bank Inc, et al
| H. SCOTT GURVEY and AMY R. GURVEY |
| M&T BANK INC, a NY Banking Corporation and SCHILLER KNAPP LEFKOWITZ & HERTZEL LLP |
| AARON M. BENDER and REED SMITH LLP |
| 21-2936 |
| October 19, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER (RESTREPO, Circuit Judge) The Appellants motion to vacate a Clerks Order dismissing the appeal for failure to pay the requisite fee is denied. Panel No.: ALD-031. Restrepo, Authoring Judge. (LMR) [Entered: 12/14/2021 11:13 AM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellants Amy R. Gurvey and Mr. H. Scott Gurvey to Vacate Clerk Order dated 11/03/2021. Certificate of Service dated 11/04/2021. Service made by US mail. (LMR) [Entered: 11/16/2021 12:58 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER (Clerk) dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1(a), for failure to pay the filing fee for the notice of appeal. Case terminated on 11/03/2021. (LMR) [Entered: 11/03/2021 01:09 PM]
|
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee M&T Bank Inc. [21-2936] (JPB) [Entered: 10/21/2021 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from James P. Berg on behalf of Appellee(s) M&T Bank i/s/h/a M&T Bank, Inc., a NY Banking Corporation. [21-2936] (JPB) [Entered: 10/21/2021 12:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 10/19/2021 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Amy R. Gurvey and Mr. H. Scott Gurvey in District Court No. 2-20-cv-07831. (LMR) [Entered: 10/19/2021 11:06 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
