Brian Davis, et al v. George Wigen, et al
| BRIAN A. DAVIS and FREDRICKA K. BECKFORD |
| GEORGE C. WIGEN, Former Warden, Moshannon Valley Correctional Center, GEO GROUP INC, DONNA MELLENDICK, Former Administrator, Bureau of Prisons Privatization Management Branch and DAVID O'NEILL, Assistant Field Director, Department of Homeland Security |
| 21-3162 |
| November 22, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Laura Schleich Irwin on behalf of Appellee(s) Donna Mellendick, Former Administrator, Bureau of Prisons Privatization Management Branch and David O'Neil, Assistant Field Director, Department of Homeland Security. [21-3162] (LSI) [Entered: 01/05/2022 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 15 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Jacqueline C. Brown, Esq. for David O'Neill and Donna Mellendick requesting the following document: Appearance Form on or before 12/21/2021. (DW) [Entered: 12/07/2021 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 14 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellants Brian A. Davis and Fredricka K. Beckford. [21-3162] (DB) [Entered: 12/06/2021 06:57 PM] |
| Filing 13 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellants Brian A. Davis and Fredricka K. Beckford advising this court that no transcripts are available. [21-3162] (DB) [Entered: 12/06/2021 06:54 PM] |
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Fredricka K. Beckford. [21-3162] (DB) [Entered: 12/06/2021 06:47 PM] |
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Brian A. Davis. [21-3162] (DB) [Entered: 12/06/2021 06:45 PM] |
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellants Brian A. Davis and Fredricka K. Beckford. [21-3162] (DB) [Entered: 12/06/2021 06:42 PM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Danielle Bruno McDermott on behalf of Appellant(s) Brian A. Davis and Fredricka K. Beckford. [21-3162] (DB) [Entered: 12/06/2021 06:36 PM] |
Filing 8
ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee George C. Wigen. [21-3162] (TAS) [Entered: 12/03/2021 03:16 PM]
|
Filing 7
ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Geo Group Inc. [21-3162] (TAS) [Entered: 12/03/2021 03:13 PM]
|
Filing 6
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Thomas A. Specht on behalf of Appellee(s) GEO Group, Inc. and George C. Wigen. [21-3162] (TAS) [Entered: 11/29/2021 02:30 PM]
|
Filing 5
ORDER (Clerk) It is noted that Appellant filed on November 22, 2021, a notice of intention to stand on the second amended complaint and an amended notice of appeal. Accordingly, the above-captioned appeal will not be submitted for dismissal at this time. This does not in any way signify that a determination of jurisdiction has been made. Only the Court can make such a decision. The parties are directed to address this Courts jurisdiction in their briefs rather than file separate responses addressing the issue. (DW) [Entered: 11/29/2021 08:15 AM]
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Intention to Stand on Second Amended Complaint and AMENDED Notice of Appeal filed in the district court on 11/22/2021 received from Clerk of District Court. (DW) [Entered: 11/23/2021 01:04 PM]
|
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (ARR) [Entered: 11/22/2021 04:34 PM]
|
Filing 2
RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (ARR) [Entered: 11/22/2021 04:28 PM]
|
Filing 1
CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Fredricka K. Beckford and Brian A. Davis in District Court No. 3-16-cv-00026. (ARR) [Entered: 11/22/2021 04:23 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.