James Bryant v. United States Marshals Service
| JAMES EDWARD BRYANT |
| UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE |
| 22-1046 |
| January 7, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 RETURNED MAIL. U.S. Postal Service returned clerk order [ # 16 ] sent to Appellant James Edward Bryant. Mail was returned because no longer at Allenwood USP. No forwarding address is available. (LMR) [Entered: 03/03/2022 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 19 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Kathryn E. Deal on behalf of Appellee(s) USA. [22-1046] (KED) [Entered: 02/23/2022 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 18 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Kathryn E. Deal, Esq. for United States Marshals Service requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 03/09/2022. (LMR) [Entered: 02/23/2022 11:08 AM] |
Filing 17
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motions are considered and resolved as follows. The appellants request to amend the caption and district-court docket number for this appeal is denied. he appellants request to lift the stay of this appeal is denied because it is unnecessary. To the extent the appellants motions ask for relief regarding Kathryn E. Deal, Esq., no action will be taken on that request. (LMR) [Entered: 02/18/2022 03:55 PM]
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER (Clerk) The motion for permission to file brief of more than 20 pages is dismissed as unnecessary. It is noted that Appellant's brief is not overlength. Appellant's pro se informal brief received by the Clerk on January 7, 2022 is handwritten and under thirty (30) pages in length. (CJG) [Entered: 02/09/2022 10:44 AM]
|
| Filing 13 MOTION filed by Appellant James Edward Bryant to Lift the Stay. (CJG) [Entered: 02/09/2022 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION filed by Appellant James Edward Bryant to Lift Stay, Regarding Service of the In Forma Pauperis Motion, to Amend the Caption and Correct the Underlying District Court Case Number. (CJG) [Entered: 02/09/2022 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 15 Petitioner James Bryant's Objection to Eastern District of Pennsylvania's Court Order with Jurisidiction of January 19th, 2022 Violative of Law and Local Rules of Court and the FRCP and to Show Stay by this Court Clerk Improper. (CJG) [Entered: 02/09/2022 10:38 AM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION filed by Appellant James Edward Bryant to Amend the Caption and to Lift the Stay. (CJG) [Entered: 02/09/2022 10:36 AM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant James Edward Bryant The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. (CJG) [Entered: 02/01/2022 09:29 AM]
|
| Filing 10 COPY OF ORDER OF DISTRICT COURT dated 01/24/2022 signed by Juan R. Sanchez. (CJG) [Entered: 02/01/2022 09:27 AM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER (Clerk) No action will be taken on the appellant's request to disqualify Kathryn E. Deal, Esq. The Clerk added that attorney to the docket for this appeal because she represents the government in a related appeal, but she has not entered an appearance in this appeal. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 46.2. If an attorney appears on behalf of the appellee in this appeal, the appellant may seek any appropriate relief regarding the attorney's appearance at that time. The appellant's separate request to lift the stay of this appeal is GRANTED. The district court denied the appellant's reconsideration motion on January 24, 2022, so this appeal will now move forward. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). (CJG) [Entered: 02/01/2022 09:23 AM]
|
| Filing 8 MOTION filed by Appellant James Edward Bryant titled "Application and Petition for A Writ of Error Coram" Requesting to Disqualifty Attorney and to Lift the 4(a)(4) Stay. Certificate of Service dated 01/21/2022. Service made by US mail. (CJG) [Entered: 02/01/2022 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION filed by Appellant James Edward Bryant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (JK) [Entered: 01/24/2022 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 3 CLERK ORDER - RULE 4(a)(4) staying case pending disposition of post decision motion(s). (LMR) [Entered: 01/12/2022 08:36 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 01/07/2022 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant James Edward Bryant in District Court No. 2-21-cv-04698. (LMR) [Entered: 01/07/2022 10:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: James Bryant v. United States Marshals Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JAMES EDWARD BRYANT | |
| Represented By: | James Edward Bryant |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE | |
| Represented By: | Kathryn E. Deal Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
