Shellie Gibbs v. Trans Union LLC, et al
| SHELLIE GIBBS |
| TRANS UNION LLC, BANK OF AMERICA NA and WELLS FARGO BANK NA, doing business as WELLS FARGO DEALER SERVICES doing business as WELLS FARGO AUTO |
| 22-1075 |
| January 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Consumer Credit |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 ECF FILER: AMENDED CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Shellie Gibbs. [22-1075] (MBW) [Entered: 01/31/2022 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 16 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellant Shellie Gibbs to clerk order advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 01/26/2022. [22-1075]--[Edited 01/26/2022 by TMM] (MBW) [Entered: 01/26/2022 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 15 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee Wells Fargo Bank NA to clerk order. Certificate of Service dated 01/26/2022. [22-1075] (JCH) [Entered: 01/26/2022 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 14 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Wells Fargo Bank NA. [22-1075] (JCH) [Entered: 01/26/2022 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 13 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jenna C. Hutchinson on behalf of Appellee(s) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. [22-1075] (JCH) [Entered: 01/26/2022 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee Trans Union LLC to clerk order advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 01/26/2022. [22-1075] (CRN) [Entered: 01/26/2022 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Shellie Gibbs. [22-1075] (MBW) [Entered: 01/25/2022 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Shellie Gibbs. [22-1075] (MBW) [Entered: 01/25/2022 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Shellie Gibbs advising this court that no transcripts are available. [22-1075] (MBW) [Entered: 01/25/2022 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Matthew B. Weisberg on behalf of Appellant(s) Shellie Gibbs. [22-1075] (MBW) [Entered: 01/25/2022 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 7 Notice received from the district court that the docketing and filing fees were paid by the appellant on 01/21/2022. (TMM) [Entered: 01/24/2022 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Trans Union LLC. [22-1075] (CRN) [Entered: 01/13/2022 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Camille R. Nicodemus on behalf of Appellee(s) Trans Union, LLC. [22-1075] (CRN) [Entered: 01/13/2022 12:27 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER (Clerk) The captioned appeals involve similar to those raised in three consolidated appeals that have already been fully briefed (Bibbs, Parke, and Samoura v. Trans Union LLC, Nos. 21-1350, 21-1527, and 21-1530). Merits briefing in the captioned appeals is STAYED until Bibbs, Parke, and Samoura have been resolved. After the Court issues its mandate in those appeals, this stay will be lifted and these appeals will proceed in an appropriate manner. If any party objects to staying these appeals , a motion seeking relief should be filed within fourteen days of this order. This stay applies only to merits briefing and not to the following obligations: fee payments, 3d Cir. L.A.R. 3.3(a); ordering transcripts, Fed. R. App. P. 10(b), 3d Cir. L.A.R. 11.1; filing case-opening forms, 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1.1, 33.2; and entering appearances of counsel, 3d Cir. L.A.R. 46.2. Failure to timely comply with those obligations may result in dismissal. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 107.1, 107.2(a). Neither does this stay alter the parties' obligation to address this Court's jurisdiction in Nos. 22-1074 and 22-1075. Deadlines for those responses were set in prior orders and remain in effect. [21-2443, 22-1074, 21-3039, 21-3040, 21-3041, 22-1075] (TMM) [Entered: 01/12/2022 04:02 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) The plaintiff has appealed after one defendant was dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction and another defendant was granted judgment on the pleadings. The claims against the third defendant were not adjudicated, however. There may therefore be no final decision to appeal under 28 U.S.C. Section 1291. See generally Aluminum Co. of Am. v. Beazer E., Inc., 124 F.3d. 551 (3d Cir. 1997) ("[T]here is no final order if claims remain unresolved and their resolution is to occur in the district court"). All parties must file written responses addressing this issue within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. (TMM) [Entered: 01/12/2022 01:01 PM]
|
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMM) [Entered: 01/12/2022 12:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Shellie Gibbs in District Court No. 2-21-cv-00667. (TMM) [Entered: 01/12/2022 12:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
