Som Maior Audio E Video Ltda v. Crestron Electronics Inc
| SOM MAIOR AUDIO E VIDEO LTDA, a Brazilian limited liability company |
| CRESTRON ELECTRONICS INC, a New Jersey for Profit Corporation |
| 22-1137 |
| January 25, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Notice to Counsel. The attached document is restricted. To view document, click on the document number link in the NDA (Notice of Docket Activity). In order to access this document, you must be the attorney of record using your individual ECF login and password. (TNH) [Entered: 03/09/2022 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Amanda K. Cipriano on behalf of Appellee(s) Crestron Electronics, Inc.. [22-1137] (AKC) [Entered: 02/08/2022 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Crestron Electronics Inc. [22-1137] (JJW) [Entered: 02/08/2022 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jeffrey J. Wild on behalf of Appellee(s) Crestron Electronics, Inc.. [22-1137] (JJW) [Entered: 02/08/2022 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Som Maior Audio E Video Ltda advising this court that no transcripts are available. [22-1137]--[Edited 02/08/2022 by CJG] (RD) [Entered: 02/07/2022 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Som Maior Audio E Video Ltda. [22-1137] (RD) [Entered: 02/07/2022 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Som Maior Audio E Video Ltda. [22-1137] (RD) [Entered: 02/07/2022 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Som Maior Audio E Video Ltda. [22-1137] (RD) [Entered: 02/07/2022 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Rodrigo Sebastian Da Silva on behalf of Appellant(s) Som Maior Audio e Video Ltda.. [22-1137] (RD) [Entered: 02/04/2022 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 3 Appendix Citation Notice sent to Rodrigo Da Silva, Esq. If unable to comply you must respond on or before 02/08/2022. (CJG) [Entered: 01/25/2022 09:10 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 01/25/2022 09:10 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Som Maior Audio E Video Ltda in District Court No. 2-20-cv-19864. (CJG) [Entered: 01/25/2022 09:08 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Som Maior Audio E Video Ltda v. Crestron Electronics Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: SOM MAIOR AUDIO E VIDEO LTDA, a Brazilian limited liability company | |
| Represented By: | Rodrigo Da Silva Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CRESTRON ELECTRONICS INC, a New Jersey for Profit Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Justin A. Corbalis Esq. |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey J. Wild Esq. |
| Represented By: | Amanda K. Cipriano Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
