William Kaetz v. USA, et al
| WILLIAM F. KAETZ |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN NEOCC |
| 22-1286 |
| February 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Mr. William F. Kaetz to listing order advising submitted for 1915(e)(2) and possible summary action. Certificate of Service dated 02/23/2022. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 03/04/2022 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Laura Schleich Irwin on behalf of Appellee(s) United States of America; NEOCC Warden. [22-1286] (LSI) [Entered: 02/23/2022 11:16 AM] |
Filing 4
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. William F. Kaetz The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. (SB) [Entered: 02/17/2022 02:56 PM]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. William F. Kaetz to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 02/22/2022. Certificate of Service dated 02/07/2022. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 02/16/2022 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB) [Entered: 02/16/2022 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. William F. Kaetz in District Court No. 2-21-cv-01614. (SB) [Entered: 02/16/2022 10:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
