Russell Johnson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
| RUSSELL JOHNSON |
| PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE |
| 22-1306 |
| February 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Brief Received. As no briefing schedule has issued, the brief is construed as a document in support of the appeal. If after disposition of the pending motions the appeal is to proceed to briefing, the parties will be advised regarding the filing date of this brief and the date for filing a responsive brief. (CJG) [Entered: 04/08/2022 09:56 AM] |
Filing 9
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Russell Johnson. The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. (CJG) [Entered: 03/24/2022 11:48 AM]
|
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from John C. Manning on behalf of Appellee(s) Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole. [22-1306] (JCM) [Entered: 03/22/2022 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 7 FOLLOW UP LETTER to John C Manning, Esq. and Joseph J. Terz, Esq. for Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole requesting Appearance Form on or before 04/04/2022. (CJG) [Entered: 03/21/2022 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 6 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Russell Johnson. (CJG) [Entered: 03/21/2022 03:14 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER (Clerk) Action on the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is deferred pending the submission of an additional document. Appellant must submit a 6 month prison account statement within 14 days of the date of this order. (CJG) [Entered: 03/08/2022 09:54 AM]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION filed by Appellant Russell Johnson to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (CJG) [Entered: 03/03/2022 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect, for possible summary action AND for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (NF) [Entered: 02/24/2022 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 02/18/2022 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Russell Johnson in District Court No. 3-21-cv-00322. (CJG) [Entered: 02/18/2022 03:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Russell Johnson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: RUSSELL JOHNSON | |
| Represented By: | Russell Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE | |
| Represented By: | John C. Manning Esq. |
| Represented By: | Joseph J. Terz Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
