Antoine Walker v. Studlack
| ANTOINE WALKER |
| C.O. STUDLACK |
| 22-1394 |
| March 3, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Antoine Walker due on or before 05/31/2022. Appendix due on or before 05/31/2022. (CJG) [Entered: 04/18/2022 10:06 AM] |
Filing 13
ORDER (Clerk) The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. (CJG) [Entered: 04/18/2022 10:01 AM]
|
| Filing 12 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Antoine Walker. (CJG) [Entered: 04/11/2022 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 11 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Antoine Walker. (CJG) [Entered: 04/11/2022 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 10 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Antoine Walker. (CJG) [Entered: 04/11/2022 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Antoine Walker to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (CJG) [Entered: 04/11/2022 02:39 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER (Clerk) The motion for extension of time to file motion to proceed in forma pauperis with supporting documents is granted. Appellant must file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, along with an addendum to the affidavit in support of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, a completed form authorizing assessments to be made from his prison account, and a certified prison account statement within 21 days from the date of this Order. Should Appellant fail to either pay the fees or file the motion with supporting documents within the time stated, he will face dismissal of the appeal pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1 without further notice. (CJG) [Entered: 04/07/2022 09:59 AM]
|
| Filing 7 CLERK LETTER SENT to Appellant in response to his 3/31/22 letter. (CJG) [Entered: 04/01/2022 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 6 LETTER MOTION filed by Appellant Antoine Walker for Extension of Time to File Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Prison Account Statement. (CJG) [Entered: 04/01/2022 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: Document No. 4 ERROR: Document No. 4 was filed on the docket in error. CORRECTION: Document No. 4 has been removed from the docket. THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. (CJG) [Entered: 03/29/2022 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Claudia M. Tesoro on behalf of Appellee(s) C.O. Studlack. [22-1394] (CMT) [Entered: 03/15/2022 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 03/03/2022 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Antoine Walker in District Court No. 1-17-cv-02371. (CJG) [Entered: 03/03/2022 02:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Antoine Walker v. Studlack | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: ANTOINE WALKER | |
| Represented By: | Antoine Walker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: C.O. STUDLACK | |
| Represented By: | Nicole R. Ditomo Esq. |
| Represented By: | Claudia M. Tesoro Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
