Terrell Marshall v. Nelson Iannuzzi, et al
| TERRELL MARSHALL |
| NELSON A. IANNUZZI and HARESH PANDYA |
| 22-1438 |
| March 11, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Terrell Marshall v. Nelson Iannuzzi |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Letter to the Court. Certificate of Service dated 04/24/2022. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 05/02/2022 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 7 RETURNED MAIL. Mail was returned once againas undeliverable. I will try again. (SB) [Entered: 03/25/2022 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Samuel H. Foreman, Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) Nelson A. Iannuzzi and Haresh Pandya. [22-1438] (SHF) [Entered: 03/16/2022 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Benjamin M. Lombard, Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) Nelson A. Iannuzzi and Haresh Pandya. [22-1438] (BML) [Entered: 03/16/2022 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 4 RETURNED MAIL. U.S. Postal Service returned Case Opening Packet [ # 1 ] sent to Appellant Terrell Marshall. Mail was returned because Mail rejected because it did not include inmate number. The mail is hereby resent to the existing address on file. The deadlines set forth originally are extended by 7 days. (SB) [Entered: 03/14/2022 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB) [Entered: 03/11/2022 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Terrell Marshall in District Court No. 3-20-cv-00489. (SB) [Entered: 03/11/2022 09:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
