Keyron Binns, et al v. Joe Torsella, et al
| KEYRON LAMONTE BINNS and SHARIF ALI GENTRY, SR. |
| JOE TORSELLA, State Treasurer of Unclaimed Property and BRIAN MUNLEY, CPA Director, Unclaimed Property |
| 22-1477 |
| March 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER (KRAUSE, RESTREPO and SMITH, Circuit Judges) granting motion to dismiss case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) filed by Appellant Keyron Lamonte Binns. Panel No.: ACO-064. Krause, Authoring Judge. (PDB) [Entered: 05/02/2022 10:09 AM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Keyron Lamonte Binns for Dismissal of Case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) Without Prejudice. Certificate of Service dated 04/04/2022. Service made by ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 04/04/2022 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 5 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (NF) [Entered: 03/18/2022 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 4 OSEI ORDER SENT informing Appellant Keyron Lamonte Binns that a party cannot represent another party in this Court. Notice of Appeal must be signed by all Appellants and returned to Clerk's Office. (PDB) [Entered: 03/16/2022 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 03/16/2022 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Keyron Lamonte Binns and Sharif Ali Gentry, Sr. in District Court No. 1-20-cv-00925. (PDB) [Entered: 03/16/2022 10:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
