Shariff Butler, et al v. John Wetzel, et al
| JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of the Department of Corections, SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL, Executive Deputy of the Department of Corrections, MELISSA ROBERTS, Former DOC Policy Coordinator, DIANE KASHMERE, Current DOC Policy Coordinator, TABB BICKELL, Executive Deputy Secretary for Institutional Operations, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, Regional Deputy Secretary, DORINA VARNER, Chief Grievance Coordinator, KERI MOORE, Assistant Chief Grievance Coordinator, LONNIE OLIVER, Former Deputy Superintendent for Facilities Management at SCI Huntingdon, JOHN THOMAS, Former Deputy Superintendent for Centralized Services at SCI Huntingdon, BYRON BRUMBAUGH, Current Deputy Superintendent for Facilities Management at SCI Huntingdon, ANTHONY E. EBERLING, Security Lt. at SCI Huntingdon, MICHELLE HARKER, Nurse Supervisor at SCI Huntingdon and JOHN BARR, Correctional Officer at SCI Huntingdon |
| SHARIFF BUTLER and JEREMEY MELVIN |
| KEVIN KAUFFMAN |
| 22-1963 |
| May 25, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER (Clerk) dismissing case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). (SLC) [Entered: 06/28/2022 08:39 AM]
|
| Filing 10 MOTION filed by Appellants Shariff Butler and Jeremey Melvin titled "Hybrid Motion Petition for Leave for Correction Based on Clerical Mistakes; Oversights and Omissions Pursuant to Fed.Civ.P.Rule 60(a) and Petition for Leave to Withdraw Misinterpreted Notice of Appeal Under Civil Case No. 22-1963", construed as a Motion to Withdraw Appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). Response due on 06/24/2022. Certificate of Service dated 06/10/2022. Service made by US mail. (SLC) [Entered: 06/28/2022 08:38 AM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: Response filed by Respondents Robert Bilger, T. Emigh, Bruce Ewell, Constance Green, Brian Harris, Kevin Kauffman, Paula Price, George Ralston, J. Reed, Mandy Sipple, Allen Stratton, Andrea Wakefield and William S. Walters in 22-8029, Appellee Kevin Kauffman in 22-1963 to original proceeding Petition 1292(b) Permission to Appeal, Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal, Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 06/02/2022. [22-8029, 22-1963] (SAK) [Entered: 06/02/2022 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 8 RETURNED MAIL. U.S. Postal Service addressed to Jeremey Melvin returned Case Opening Packet [ # 1 ] sent to Appellant Shariff Butler. Mail returned by Post Office for: refused due to postage. The deadlines set forth originally are extended by 14 days. (SLC) [Entered: 06/02/2022 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 6 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 05/31/2022 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 7 Exhibit by Appellant to Notice of Appeal. (SLC) [Entered: 06/02/2022 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Sean A. Kirkpatrick on behalf of Appellee(s) Kevin Kauffman, William Scott Walters, Brian Harris, Mandy Sipple, Bruce Ewell, Constance Green, Robert Bilger, Paula Price, Andrea Wakefield, George Ralston, Allen Stratton, J. Reed, and T. Emigh. [22-1963] (SAK) [Entered: 05/26/2022 04:08 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) for all parties represented by Daniel P. McGannon, Esq. or any othre attorney from the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, the designated filer shall be Kevin Kauffman. (SLC) [Entered: 05/25/2022 11:18 AM]
|
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SLC) [Entered: 05/25/2022 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Shariff Butler and Jeremey Melvin in District Court No. 4-19-cv-02171. (SLC) [Entered: 05/25/2022 10:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
