Kenneth Reid, et al v. Ebbert, et al
ANTHONY BURNETT |
KENNETH R. REID |
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE, ERIC HOUSTON, BRANDON JAQUAY HOLMES, SAMUEL GAINES and MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY |
DAVID J EBBERT |
22-1980 |
May 27, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Mr. Kenneth R. Reid. (CJG) [Entered: 07/19/2022 09:51 AM] |
Filing 24 Letter Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Kenneth R. Reid for Sixty (60) Day Extension of Time to File for In Forma Pauperis. (CJG) [Entered: 07/19/2022 09:51 AM] |
Filing 23 ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing is considered. The Court will not contact the prison to obtain the account statement as that is Appellants responsibility. Appellant must submit a 6 month prison account statement within 14 days of the date of this order or the appeal may be dismissed. It is noted that Appellants affidavit of poverty, authorization and addendum were received and filed on June 8, 2022. (LMR) [Entered: 07/12/2022 09:27 AM] |
Filing 22 ORDER (Clerk) No action will be taken on the motion as it is unnecessary. It is noted that Appellees are not required to pay filing fees or submit requests for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (LMR) [Entered: 07/12/2022 09:25 AM] |
Filing 21 Letter by Appellant received on July 6, 2022, Regarding Appellants Six Month Prison Account Statement (LMR) [Entered: 07/07/2022 09:14 PM] |
Filing 19 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Mr. Kenneth R. Reid to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal. (LMR) [Entered: 06/30/2022 12:27 PM] |
Filing 20 MOTION filed by Appellee Samuel Gaines titled Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, construed as a Motion for Extension of Time to File Six Month Prison Account Statement (LMR) [Entered: 07/01/2022 11:41 AM] |
Filing 18 RETURNED MAIL. U.S. Postal Service returned Case Opening Packet [ # 1 ] sent to Appellee Eric Houston. Mail was returned because no longer here. No forwarding address is available. (LMR) [Entered: 06/22/2022 09:03 AM] |
Filing 17 RETURNED MAIL. U.S. Postal Service returned Case Opening Packet [ # 1 ] sent to Non-Participating Anthony Burnett. Mail was returned because no longer here. No forwarding address is available. (LMR) [Entered: 06/22/2022 08:58 AM] |
Filing 16 RETURNED MAIL. U.S. Postal Service returned Case Opening Packet [ # 1 ] sent to Appellee Mandriez Ramon Spivey. Mail was returned because not at this address. No forwarding address is available. (LMR) [Entered: 06/22/2022 08:56 AM] |
Filing 14 ORDER (Clerk) Action on the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is deferred pending the submission of an additional document. Appellant must submit a prison account statement outlining the account history for the previous 6 months within 14 days of the date of this order or the appeal may be dismissed. (LMR) [Entered: 06/15/2022 12:09 PM] |
Filing 15 RETURNED MAIL. U.S. Postal Service returned Case Opening Packet [ # 1 ] sent to Appellee Samuel Gaines. Mail was returned because "no longer here". The address has been updated and mail resent. (LMR) [Entered: 06/15/2022 12:51 PM] |
Filing 13 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Timothy S. Judge, AUSA on behalf of Appellee(s) Warden J. Ebbert, et al.. [22-1980] (TSJ) [Entered: 06/14/2022 09:50 AM] |
Filing 11 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Timothy S. Judge, Esq. for David J Ebbert and Shana C. Priore, Esq. for David J Ebbert requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 06/27/2022. (LMR) [Entered: 06/13/2022 03:50 PM] |
Filing 10 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Kenneth R. Reid for Court to certify lawsuit as class action, to appoint counsel. (LMR) [Entered: 06/13/2022 03:46 PM] |
Filing 9 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Mr. Kenneth R. Reid to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal. (LMR) [Entered: 06/13/2022 03:42 PM] |
Filing 12 RETURNED MAIL. U.S. Postal Service returned Case Opening Packet [ # 1 ] sent to Appellee Anthony Burnett. Mail was returned because "Not Legal Mail, does not meet BOP requirments for legal mail". Appellee was released, no forwarding address is available. (LMR) [Entered: 06/14/2022 09:22 AM] |
Filing 8 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Mr. Kenneth R. Reid. (LMR) [Entered: 06/13/2022 02:49 PM] |
Filing 7 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Mr. Kenneth R. Reid. (LMR) [Entered: 06/13/2022 02:48 PM] |
Filing 6 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Mr. Kenneth R. Reid. (LMR) [Entered: 06/13/2022 02:47 PM] |
Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Kenneth R. Reid to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (LMR) [Entered: 06/13/2022 02:46 PM] |
Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (JW) [Entered: 06/02/2022 02:55 PM] |
Filing 3 ORDER (Clerk) To facilitate electronic filing for larger groups of parties represented by the same attorney, the first named party in each group will be the designated filer, as follows: For all parties represented by the U.S. Attorney's Office, the designated filer shall be Warden David J. Ebbert. Counsel is advised that the designated filer is for cm/ecf filing purposes only. Names of all represented parties must be listed on all forms, motions and briefs. Attorneys representing smaller groups of parties must select all individual persons or entities as filers in cm/ecf. (PDB) [Entered: 05/27/2022 10:56 AM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 05/27/2022 10:49 AM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Kenneth R. Reid in District Court No. 1-16-cv-01403. (PDB) [Entered: 05/27/2022 10:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.