Lacey Stradford, et al v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
| LACEY STRADFORD, WILLIAM NETTLES, JESSE STROUD, WILLIAM SCOTT and RICHARD RICHARDSON, on behalf of THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED |
| SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 22-2027 |
| June 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 32 MANDATE ISSUED. [21-2655, 22-2027] (ARR) [Entered: 02/14/2023 01:23 PM] |
Filing 31
ORDER (CHAGARES, Chief Judge, AMBRO*, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS, PORTER, MATEY and PHIPPS, Circuit Judges) denying Petition En Banc and Panel Rehearing filed by Appellees Lacey Stradford, William Nettles, Jesse Stroud, William Scott and Richard Richardson. PORTER, Authoring Judge. [21-2655, 22-2027] *(Judge Ambro assumed senior status on February 6, 2023.) (DW) [Entered: 02/06/2023 12:28 PM]
|
| Filing 30 ECF FILER: Petition filed by Appellees William Nettles, Richard Richardson, William Scott, Lacey Stradford and Jesse Stroud in 21-2655, 22-2027 for Rehearing before original panel and the court en banc. Certificate of Service dated 11/23/2022. Service made by ECF. [21-2655, 22-2027] (DD) [Entered: 11/23/2022 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 29 JUDGMENT, REVERSED and REMANDED. The District Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Appellant. The appeal of the order of the District Court entered April, 29, 2022, is dismissed as moot. Costs are taxed against Appellees. [21-2655, 22-2027] (AMR) [Entered: 11/09/2022 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 28 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION. Coram: JORDAN, PORTER and PHIPPS, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 21. Judge: PORTER Authoring. [21-2655, 22-2027] (AMR) [Entered: 11/09/2022 09:52 AM] |
|
Filing 27
ORDER (Clerk) The status report order entered on July 1, 2022 is hereby vacated, having been issued in error. The Court's order did not stay the appeals. In light of the foregoing, no action will be taken on Appellant's motion to clarify or Appellees' response. . [21-2655, 22-2027] (DW) [Entered: 07/08/2022 10:01 AM]
|
| Filing 26 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellees William Nettles, Richard Richardson, William Scott, Lacey Stradford and Jesse Stroud in 21-2655, 22-2027 to Order/Opinion (use to reconsider, clarify, amend, vacate or review an order or opinion). Certificate of Service dated 07/07/2022. [21-2655, 22-2027] (DD) [Entered: 07/07/2022 09:55 PM] |
| Filing 25 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections in 21-2655, 22-2027 to clarify order dated 07/01/2022. Certificate of Service dated 07/06/2022. Service made by ECF. [21-2655, 22-2027] (DBM) [Entered: 07/06/2022 03:44 PM] |
|
Filing 24
ORDER (Clerk) directing status report to be filed on or before 08/01/2022. [21-2655, 22-2027] (---VACATED, per Clerk's Order dated July 8, 2022--)--[Edited 07/08/2022 by DW] (CLW) [Entered: 07/01/2022 04:12 PM]
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER (JORDAN, PORTER and PHIPPS, Circuit Judges) granting motion by Appellant to Stay the District Court's April 29, 2022 Order Pending Appeal. Porter, Authoring Judge. [21-2655, 22-2027] (CLW) [Entered: 07/01/2022 04:02 PM]
|
| Filing 22 ARGUED on Wednesday, June 29, 2022. Panel: JORDAN, PORTER and *PHIPPS, Circuit Judges. : Donald Driscoll arguing for Appellees William Nettles, Richard Richardson, William Scott, Lacey Stradford, William Scott; Daniel B. Mullen arguing for Appellant Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. *Paticipated via zoom conference. [21-2655, 22-2027] (CMH) [Entered: 06/29/2022 12:36 PM] |
| Filing 21 COURT MINUTES OF ARGUED/SUBMITTED CASES. [20-1691, 21-2655, 22-2027, 21-1162, 21-2346] (CMH) [Entered: 06/29/2022 07:38 AM] |
| Filing 20 ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF on behalf of Appellant Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections in 21-2655, 22-2027. Certificate of Service dated 06/15/2022 by ECF. [21-2655, 22-2027] (DBM) [Entered: 06/15/2022 05:17 PM] |
| Filing 19 ECF FILER: SUMMARY OF ORAL ARGUMENT submitted by Attorney Daniel B. Mullen, Esq. for Appellant Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections in 21-2655, 22-2027. Case Summary: The lower court erred in ruling for sex offenders in an Equal Protection challenge to a DOC policy for placing parolees into halfway homes. Sex offenders are not similarly situated with other parolees, and the policy easily passes rational basis review.. Post Video: YES. [21-2655, 22-2027] (DBM) [Entered: 06/13/2022 10:22 PM] |
| Filing 18 ECF FILER: SUMMARY OF ORAL ARGUMENT submitted by Attorney Alexandra Morgan-Kurtz, Esq. for Appellees Lacey Stradford, William Nettles, Jesse Stroud, William Scott and Richard Richardson in 22-2027. Case Summary: Appellees, a class of individuals with a sex offense classification who have been approved for parole yet remain incarcerated, brought an equal protection challenge to the DOC's failure to place them in its halfway house system due to unfounded prejudice.. Post Video: YES. [21-2655, 22-2027] (AM) [Entered: 06/13/2022 07:53 PM] |
| Filing 17 ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC BRIEF on behalf of Appellees William Nettles, Richard Richardson, William Scott, Lacey Stradford and Jesse Stroud in 22-2027. Certificate of Service dated 06/13/2022 by ECF. [21-2655, 22-2027] (AM) [Entered: 06/13/2022 07:40 PM] |
| Filing 16 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Donald Driscoll on behalf of Appellee(s) Lacey Stradford, William Nettles, Jesse Stroud, William Scott, Richard Richardson on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated. [22-2027] (DD) [Entered: 06/10/2022 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 15 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellees Lacey Stradford, Richard Richardson, William Scott, Jesse Stroud and William Nettles. [22-2027] (DD) [Entered: 06/09/2022 08:27 PM] |
| Filing 14 ECF FILER: ARGUMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT filed by Attorney Donald Driscoll, Esq. for Appellees William Nettles, Richard Richardson, William Scott, Lacey Stradford and Jesse Stroud. Certificate of Service dated 06/09/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2027] (DD) [Entered: 06/09/2022 08:24 PM] |
| Filing 13 ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX on behalf of Appellant Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections in 21-2655, 22-2027. Certificate of service dated 06/08/2022 by ECF. [21-2655, 22-2027] (DBM) [Entered: 06/08/2022 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF on behalf of Appellant Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections in 21-2655, 22-2027. Certificate of Service dated 06/08/2022 by ECF. [21-2655, 22-2027] (DBM) [Entered: 06/08/2022 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 11 Oral Argument Notification for Wednesday, 06/29/2022. Setting & Time: Maris Courtroom/9:30am. Location: Philadelphia, PA. [21-2655, 22-2027] (CMH) [Entered: 06/08/2022 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: ARGUMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT filed by Attorney Daniel B. Mullen, Esq. for Appellant Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. Certificate of Service dated 06/07/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2027] (DBM) [Entered: 06/07/2022 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 9 Calendared for Thursday, 06/30/2022. Calendar Clerk: CMH. (PM) [Entered: 06/03/2022 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 8 CLERK ORDER It is noted that Appellant filed a new appeal from the District Court's April 29, 2022 order. The new appeal has been docketed at No. 22-2027. The actions at Nos. 21-2655 and 22-2027 are hereby consolidated for disposition. No. 21-2655 is calendared before a panel of this Court for Thursday, June 30, 2022. The consolidated cases will remain on the calendar as scheduled. In light of the upcoming calendar date, the Court will limit the briefing for the new appeal and apply the following expedited briefing schedule: Appellant's supplemental brief of no more than 3,000 words and the supplemental appendix must be filed and served no later than Wednesday, June 8, 2022; Appellees' supplemental response brief of no more than 3,000 words must be filed and served no later than Monday, June 13, 2022; Appellant's supplemental reply brief, if any, of no more than 1,000 words must be filed and served no later than Wednesday, June 15, 2022. Formal briefs are not required. The parties may file letter briefs. The parties do not need to provide hard copies of the supplemental briefs and appendix to the Clerk. [21-2655, 22-2027] (ARR) [Entered: 06/03/2022 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections in 22-2027, 21-2655 to stay the District Court's April 29, 2022 Order Modifying the Judgment. Certificate of Service dated 06/03/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2027, 21-2655] (DBM) [Entered: 06/03/2022 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections advising this court that transcripts are already on file in the District Court. [22-2027] (DBM) [Entered: 06/03/2022 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. [22-2027] (DBM) [Entered: 06/03/2022 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. [22-2027] (DBM) [Entered: 06/03/2022 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Daniel B. Mullen on behalf of Appellant(s) Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. [22-2027] (DBM) [Entered: 06/03/2022 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (ARR) [Entered: 06/02/2022 05:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections in District Court No. 2-16-cv-02064. (ARR) [Entered: 06/02/2022 05:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
