Gerald EdwardsIn re: Gerald Edwards
In re: GERALD EDWARDS |
KAREN B. RICE |
22-2247 |
July 11, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Gerald Edwards requesting Filing fee or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Compliance due 07/25/2022. [SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT] (AMR) [Entered: 07/11/2022 10:09 AM] |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner Gerald Edwards. (AMR) [Entered: 07/11/2022 09:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Gerald EdwardsIn re: Gerald Edwards | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: GERALD EDWARDS | |
Represented By: | Gerald Edwards |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: KAREN B. RICE | |
Represented By: | Keith J. Bidlingmaier Esq. |
Represented By: | Rachel E. Thompson Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.