Jerome Washington v. Gilmore, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee: MR. GILMORE, Superintendent, C.O. J. JONES, CITY OF PITTSBURGH and STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 22-2408
Filed: August 3, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 16, 2023 Jerome Washington v. Gilmore

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2022 Filing 15 INFORMAL BRIEF on behalf of Appellant Jerome Junior Washington. Certificate of Service dated 08/28/2022 by US mail. Service to parties/counsel by Clerk's Office via ECF on 09/07/2022.--[Edited 09/08/2022 by GPK to update service.] (TMS) [Entered: 09/07/2022 05:36 PM]
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER (Clerk) no action will be taken on motion to proceed in forma pauperis as it is unnecessary filed by Appellant Jerome Junior Washington. It is noted that this Court has already granted Appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter. (KR) [Entered: 08/31/2022 11:41 AM]
August 23, 2022 Filing 13 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Jerome Junior Washington due on or before 10/03/2022. Appendix due on or before 10/03/2022. (KR) [Entered: 08/23/2022 04:14 PM]
August 23, 2022 Filing 12 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Jerome Junior Washington. (KR) [Entered: 08/23/2022 03:54 PM]
August 23, 2022 Filing 11 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Jerome Junior Washington. (KR) [Entered: 08/23/2022 03:52 PM]
August 23, 2022 Filing 10 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Jerome Junior Washington. (KR) [Entered: 08/23/2022 03:51 PM]
August 23, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Jerome Junior Washington to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 09/02/2022. Certificate of Service dated 08/23/2022. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 08/23/2022 03:49 PM]
August 18, 2022 Filing 8 ECF FILER: NOT PARTICIPATING LETTER from Attorney Julie E. Koren, Esq. for Appellee City of Pittsburgh notifying the Court that the City of Pittsburgh does not intend to participate in this appeal. Certificate of Service dated 08/18/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2408]--[Edited 08/18/2022 by KR] (JEK) [Entered: 08/18/2022 02:08 PM]
August 18, 2022 Filing 7 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Julie E. Koren, Esq. for City of Pittsburgh requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 09/01/2022. (KR) [Entered: 08/18/2022 09:07 AM]
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Jerome Junior Washington. (KR) [Entered: 08/17/2022 01:41 PM]
August 10, 2022 Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Daniel B. Mullen on behalf of Appellee(s) Robert Gilmore; Jason Jones; Pennsylvania. [22-2408] (DBM) [Entered: 08/10/2022 09:44 AM]
August 8, 2022 Filing 5 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Jerome Junior Washington. (KR) [Entered: 08/11/2022 10:58 AM]
August 3, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION filed by Appellant Jerome Junior Washington to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 08/15/2022. Certificate of Service dated 08/03/2022. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 08/03/2022 02:56 PM]
August 3, 2022 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (KR) [Entered: 08/03/2022 02:49 PM]
August 3, 2022 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Jerome Junior Washington in District Court No. 2-18-cv-00342. (KR) [Entered: 08/03/2022 02:37 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jerome Washington v. Gilmore, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Represented By: Jerome Junior Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MR. GILMORE, Superintendent
Represented By: Scott A. Bradley Esq.
Represented By: Daniel B. Mullen Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: C.O. J. JONES
Represented By: Scott A. Bradley Esq.
Represented By: Daniel B. Mullen Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Represented By: Yvonne S. Hilton Esq.
Represented By: Julie E. Koren Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: Scott A. Bradley Esq.
Represented By: Daniel B. Mullen Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?