Randy Washington v. Charles Ellis, et al
| RANDY K. WASHINGTON |
| CHARLES ELLIS, Warden, TIMOTHY FRIEL, JOHN DOE MERCER COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICERS, MERCER COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF, SGT. TAMAINE GRIER, DR. DEEHAN, LT. ZEGARSKI, Mercer County Correction Center, LT. LYSZCAK, Mercer County Correction Center and DEPUTY WARDEN OLIVER |
| 22-2473 |
| August 10, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER (BIBAS, Circuit Judges) Appellants letter, treated as a motion to vacate the August 31, 2022, Clerk Order granting Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis and assessing fees; and request to close appeal is granted. The August 31, 2022, Clerks Order is VACATED. It is hereby ORDERED that the warden of Appellants prison shall immediately cease assessing fees for the above-docketed appeal and the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey shall immediately cease collecting such fees. To the extent any fees have been assessed/collected, the District Court may wish to consider whether to refund the amount of such fees to the Appellants prison account. The request to withdraw the appeal is granted and the matter is hereby dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) without cost to either party. A certified copy of this order is issued in lieu of a formal mandate. Panel No.: BCO-114. Bibas, Authoring Judge. (SB) [Entered: 09/19/2022 09:54 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Letter from Appellant, treated as Motion to Vacate the August 31, 2022 Clerk Order granting Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis and assessing fees; and request to close appeal.. Response due on 09/19/2022. Certificate of Service dated 09/05/2022. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 09/14/2022 11:33 AM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Randy K. Washington. The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. Appellants motion for extension of time to file additional PLRA forms is denied as unnecessary as the Court already received his motion to proceed in forma pauperis and prison account statement, and the information included in those filings was sufficient to establish Appellants indigency. [VACATED per 9/19/22 Court Order] (SB) [Entered: 08/31/2022 08:34 AM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Randy K. Washington for Extension of Time to File PLRA In Forma Pauperis Forms. Certificate of Service dated 08/17/2022. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 08/25/2022 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 5 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Randy K. Washington. (TMM) [Entered: 08/18/2022 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION filed by Appellant Randy K. Washington to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 08/14/2022. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 08/18/2022 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 08/15/2022 12:20 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB) [Entered: 08/10/2022 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Randy K. Washington in District Court No. 3-17-cv-07243. (SB) [Entered: 08/10/2022 02:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
