Richard Lewis v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
| RICHARD L. LEWIS |
| WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE |
| 22-2480 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Letter from Appellant with partial record. Certificate of Service dated 09/21/2022. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 09/28/2022 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Richard L. Lewis for Certificate of Appealability. Response due on 09/26/2022. Certificate of Service dated 09/12/2022. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 09/14/2022 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant Richard L. Lewis to Extend Time to File a Certificate of Appealability. Response due on 09/19/2022. Certificate of Service dated 09/08/2022. Service made by Email. (SB) [Entered: 09/08/2022 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (JW) [Entered: 08/19/2022 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Brian L. Arban on behalf of Appellee(s) AG State of Delaware; Warden JTVCC. [22-2480] (BLA) [Entered: 08/12/2022 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB) [Entered: 08/11/2022 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Richard L. Lewis in District Court No. 1-18-cv-02028. (SB) [Entered: 08/11/2022 11:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
