Chalmers Simpson, Jr. v. Vision Property Management, et al
VISION PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, ALAN INVESTMENTS III LLC and BUREAU OF CODE ADMINISTRATION |
CHALMERS A. SIMPSON, JR. |
22-2487 |
August 12, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Civil Rights Voting |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Argument in Support of the Appeal filed by Appellant Chalmers A. Simpson, Jr. (KR) [Entered: 09/20/2022 10:56 AM] |
Filing 5 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (NF) [Entered: 08/17/2022 04:16 PM] |
Filing 4 ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Chalmers A. Simpson, Jr. The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. (KR) [Entered: 08/17/2022 02:39 PM] |
Filing 3 MOTION filed by Appellant Chalmers A. Simpson, Jr. to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 08/12/2022. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 08/12/2022 09:14 AM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (KR) [Entered: 08/12/2022 09:13 AM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Chalmers A. Simpson, Jr. in District Court No. 1-21-cv-01205. (KR) [Entered: 08/12/2022 08:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.