Nathan Rowan v. US Dealer Services Inc
| NATHAN ROWAN |
| US DEALER SERVICES INC |
| 22-2522 |
| August 19, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMK) [Entered: 08/19/2022 08:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Nathan Rowan in District Court No. 2-21-cv-09945. (TMK) [Entered: 08/19/2022 08:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Nathan Rowan v. US Dealer Services Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: NATHAN ROWAN | |
| Represented By: | Stefan L. Coleman Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: US DEALER SERVICES INC | |
| Represented By: | Mark E. Critchley Esq. |
| Represented By: | Bobby Kasolas Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
