National Liability & Fire Insurance Co v. Brimar Transit Inc
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATIONAL LIABILITY & FIRE INSURANCE CO
Defendant / Appellee: BRIMAR TRANSIT INC
Not Yet Classified: PITTSBURGH PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
Case Number: 22-2565
Filed: August 30, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Insurance

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 22, 2023 National Liability & Fire Insurance Co v. Brimar Transit Inc

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2022 Filing 21 Notice to Counsel. The attached document is restricted. To view document, click on the document number link in the NDA (Notice of Docket Activity). In order to access this document, you must be the attorney of record using your individual ECF login and password. (TNH) [Entered: 09/19/2022 03:46 PM]
September 19, 2022 Filing 19 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Brimar Transit Inc. [22-2565] (SHL) [Entered: 09/19/2022 12:11 PM]
September 16, 2022 Filing 18 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Robert A. Lebovitz, Esq. and Stephen H. Lebovitz, Esq. for Brimar Transit Inc requesting the following document(s): Disclosure Statement on or before 09/30/2022. (CJG) [Entered: 09/16/2022 03:25 PM]
September 15, 2022 Filing 17 Attorney Bar status modified for Robert A. Lebovitz, Esq. for Brimar Transit Inc and Stephen H. Lebovitz, Esq. for Brimar Transit Inc. Status is now active. (TMK) [Entered: 09/15/2022 08:45 AM]
September 15, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE REGARDING ATTORNEY STATUS for APPEARANCE FORM filed by Attorney Stephen H. Lebovitz, Esq. for Appellee Brimar Transit Inc. Counsel's current status in this Court's attorney rolls is inactive. An attorney must have active status in order to appear before this Court. R.A.D.E. 17.3. If you wish to return to active status or if you believe that you have been marked inactive in error, please complete the Attorney Admission Renewal/Adjustment of Status Form available on this Court's website by 09/29/2022. Future filings will not be accepted from an attorney in inactive status. (TMK) [Entered: 09/15/2022 08:12 AM]
September 14, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE REGARDING ATTORNEY STATUS for APPEARANCE FORM filed by Attorney Robert A. Lebovitz, Esq. for Appellee Brimar Transit Inc. Counsel's current status in this Court's attorney rolls is inactive. An attorney must have active status in order to appear before this Court. R.A.D.E. 17.3. If you wish to return to active status or if you believe that you have been marked inactive in error, please complete the Attorney Admission Renewal/Adjustment of Status Form available on this Court's website by 09/28/2022. Future filings will not be accepted from an attorney in inactive status. (TMK) [Entered: 09/14/2022 03:12 PM]
September 14, 2022 Filing 14 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Robert A. Lebovitz, Esquire on behalf of Appellee(s) Brimar Transit, Inc.. [22-2565] (RAL) [Entered: 09/14/2022 02:32 PM]
September 13, 2022 Filing 13 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Matthew C. Fergus on behalf of Appellee(s) The Board of Education of the School District of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. [22-2565] (MCF) [Entered: 09/13/2022 02:27 PM]
September 13, 2022 Filing 12 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Stephen H. Lebovitz, Esquire on behalf of Appellee(s) Brimar Transit, Inc.. [22-2565] (SHL) [Entered: 09/13/2022 12:06 PM]
September 12, 2022 Filing 11 ECF FILER: Response filed by Intervenor-appellee Pittsburgh Public School District to Clerks 08/30/22 Order. Certificate of Service dated 09/12/2022. [22-2565]--[Edited 09/16/2022 by CJG] (JND) [Entered: 09/12/2022 08:23 PM]
September 12, 2022 Filing 10 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jaime N. Doherty on behalf of Appellee(s) Board of Education of the School District of Pittsburgh. [22-2565] (JND) [Entered: 09/12/2022 04:57 PM]
September 12, 2022 Filing 9 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant National Liability & Fire Insurance Co advising this court that transcripts are already on file in the District Court. [22-2565] (WE) [Entered: 09/12/2022 03:24 PM]
September 12, 2022 Filing 8 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant National Liability & Fire Insurance Co. [22-2565] (WE) [Entered: 09/12/2022 03:21 PM]
September 12, 2022 Filing 7 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant National Liability & Fire Insurance Co. [22-2565] (WE) [Entered: 09/12/2022 03:06 PM]
September 12, 2022 Filing 6 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant National Liability & Fire Insurance Co. [22-2565] (WE) [Entered: 09/12/2022 03:01 PM]
September 12, 2022 Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Wendy N. Enerson on behalf of Appellant(s) National Liability & Fire Insurance Company. [22-2565] (WE) [Entered: 09/12/2022 03:00 PM]
September 12, 2022 Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Charles J. Jesuit, Jr. on behalf of Appellant(s) National Liability & Fire Insurance Company. [22-2565] (CJJ) [Entered: 09/12/2022 02:56 PM]
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER (Clerk) During the district-court proceedings, Pittsburgh Public School District (the "District") participated as an intervenor. The District is directed to advise this Court within 14 days of the date of this order if it will participate in the appeal and, if so, what party it will support. If the District wishes to participate in the appeal and file a separate brief, the brief will be due on the same day as the party it is supporting. The District and the party it is supporting are encouraged to consult with one another regarding the contents of their briefs as the Court disfavors repetitive briefs. The District may join in or adopt portions by reference. See Fed. R. App. P. 28(i). Failure to respond to this order will be deemed a notice of non-participation and The District will not be permitted to file a brief. (JK) [Entered: 08/30/2022 10:58 AM]
August 30, 2022 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 08/30/2022 10:52 AM]
August 30, 2022 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant National Liability & Fire Insurance Co in District Court No. 2-18-cv-01129. (JK) [Entered: 08/30/2022 10:46 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: National Liability & Fire Insurance Co v. Brimar Transit Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: NATIONAL LIABILITY & FIRE INSURANCE CO
Represented By: Wendy Enerson Esq.
Represented By: Eugene A. Giotto Esq.
Represented By: Charles J. Jesuit Esq. Jr.
Represented By: Richard C. Mason Esq.
Represented By: Paul D. Steinman Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BRIMAR TRANSIT INC
Represented By: Robert A. Lebovitz Esq.
Represented By: Stephen H. Lebovitz Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: PITTSBURGH PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
Represented By: Jaime N. Doherty Esq.
Represented By: Matthew C. Fergus Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?