ReDale Benton-Flores v. Lloyd Austin, III
| REDALE BENTON-FLORES |
| LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DODEA) |
| 22-2573 |
| August 29, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUIPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant ReDale Benton-Flores to possible dismissal [ # 3 ]. Certificate of Service dated 10/22/2022. Service made by US mail. (JK) [Entered: 10/27/2022 12:05 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion for extension of time filed by Appellant ReDale Benton-Flores to prepare case and secure legal representation. Appellant must obtain attorney/legal representation within 21 days of the date of this order. If Appellant has not obtained attorney/legal representation by within the timeframe given, Appellant must be prepared to proceed pro se on appeal. Appellant's response to the Clerk's letter dated September 2, 2022, advising of possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect must be filed within 21 days of the date of this order. (JK) [Entered: 10/04/2022 03:15 PM]
|
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Ben Kuruvilla, AUSA on behalf of Appellee(s) LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III. [22-2573] (BK) [Entered: 09/27/2022 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from J. Andrew Ruymann, AUSA on behalf of Appellee(s) LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III. [22-2573] (JAR) [Entered: 09/27/2022 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant ReDale Benton-Flores to possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect [ # 3 ]. Certificate of Service dated 09/20/2022. Service made by US mail.--[Edited 09/26/2022 by JK] (JK) [Entered: 09/26/2022 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 5 FOLLOW UP LETTER to J. Andrew Ruymann, Esq. for Lloyd J. Austin, III requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 09/30/2022. (CJG) [Entered: 09/16/2022 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION filed by Appellant ReDale Benton-Flores for Extension of Time to prepare case and secure an attorney/legal representation. Response due on 09/22/2022. Certificate of Service dated 09/07/2022. Service made by US mail.--[Edited 09/13/2022 by JK] (JK) [Entered: 09/12/2022 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 09/02/2022 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 08/29/2022 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant ReDale Benton-Flores in District Court No. 1-22-cv-00309. (JK) [Entered: 08/29/2022 02:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: ReDale Benton-Flores v. Lloyd Austin, III | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: REDALE BENTON-FLORES | |
| Represented By: | ReDale Benton-Flores |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DODEA) | |
| Represented By: | J. Andrew Ruymann Esq. |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Kuruvilla Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
