Robert Johnson v. ISS at Mars, et al
ROBERT W. JOHNSON |
ISS AT MARS and CELEST HUNT |
22-2631 |
September 1, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER (Clerk) referring to a motions panel the motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Robert W. Johnson. If the Court determines that the appellant may proceed in forma pauperis, the Court will proceed to determine whether the appeal will be dismissed as legally frivolous under 28 U.S.C. '1915(e)(2) or whether summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. is appropriate. In making this determination, the district court opinion and record will be examined. Appellant may submit argument, not to exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the Clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. Appellee need not file a response unless directed to do so. The Court may reconsider in forma pauperis status or request additional information at any time during the course of these proceedings. (TMM) [Entered: 10/18/2022 11:03 AM] |
Filing 3 MOTION filed by Appellant Robert W. Johnson to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 09/02/2022. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 10/12/2022 04:29 PM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMM) [Entered: 09/01/2022 11:35 AM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Robert W. Johnson in District Court No. 2-22-cv-00406. (TMM) [Entered: 09/01/2022 11:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.