Ashu Shukla v. Director United States Citizenship and Immigration
| ASHU SHUKLA |
| DIRECTOR UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES TEXAS SERVICE CENTER |
| 22-2727 |
| September 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| - Other Immigration Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 ECF FILER: LETTER from Party Ashu Shukla This Court must address critical issues on plaintiff's case now, including the appearance of David Dauenheimer and the departure of Patricia Dodszuweit. Deloitte's negligent act of not terminating their HR profs. remains the prime reason of liability.. Certificate of Service dated 10/06/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2727] (AS) [Entered: 10/06/2022 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 16 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Ashu Shukla to compel or require NJ DOL to grant plaintiff's pending unemployment benefits from March 2021 till date, and Plaintiff's Mortgage Provider Provident Bank to grant forbearance on plaintiff's Mortgage beginning late 2020, for Judicial Notice, to stay briefing schedule. Certificate of Service dated 10/06/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2727] (AS) [Entered: 10/06/2022 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 15 ECF FILER: Show Cause Response filed by Party Ashu Shukla. [22-2727] (AS) [Entered: 10/03/2022 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 14 ECF FILER: LETTER from Party Ashu Shukla The Clerk of this court is not a Judge, lacks authority to enter orders based on her personal / political preference outside of FRAP / LAR. If no clarification / relevant authority is provided, the order shall be stricken off the case docket / reversed.. Certificate of Service dated 10/03/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2727] (AS) [Entered: 10/03/2022 11:39 AM] |
Filing 13
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion is considered. No action will be taken on the motion to the extent Appellant requests to rely on previously filed brief and appendix. It is noted that this case is listed for possible dismissal due to a jurisdictional defect. A briefing schedule will not be issued until a panel of the Court either declines to dismiss the case or refers the jurisdictional issue to a merits panel. If this case proceeds to briefing, Appellant may file a renewed motion to rely on a previously filed brief and appendix at that time. Appellant's request to compel Deloitte Consulting LLP be added as a defendant is referred to the same panel of the Court that will consider the jurisdictional issue. Lastly, Appellant's request for leave for his in forma pauperis status in appeal No. 22-2029 to be carried over to this appeal is denied. As this is a new, unrelated matter, Appellant must pay a new filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this case. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, Appellant must either pay to the district court the entire docketing and filing fee of $505.00 or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this Court. Should Appellant fail to either pay the fees or file the motion to proceed in forma pauperis within the time stated, the appeal will be dismissed without further notice pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1. (AMR) [Entered: 10/03/2022 10:30 AM]
|
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC ADDENDUM to MOTION on behalf of Appellant Ashu Shukla containing Addendum to plaintiff's Motion filed on September 26th 2022. Clear and Convincing Evidence of Bias by this US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit against the plaintiff. The onus is now back on this court to correct its own frivolous/biased Judgements.. Certificate of Service dated 10/03/2022 by ECF. [22-2727] (AS) [Entered: 10/03/2022 07:13 AM] |
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC ADDENDUM to MOTION on behalf of Appellant Ashu Shukla containing Supplemental to Plaintiff's Motion Filed on September 26th 2022. Federal Laws Provide Witnesses such as Partner Deborshi Dutt, Kartik Nagaraja, Brian Zhong and others until September 26th 2027 to expose the malicious business practices of Deloitte.. Certificate of Service dated 09/28/2022 by ECF. [22-2727] (AS) [Entered: 09/28/2022 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Ashu Shukla to disqualify opposing counsel, to compel or require Asst. District Attorney from New Jersey Mr. David Dauenheimer, Esq. to make an appearance on the case, and disqualify Vanessa Molina from making an appearance or representing USCIS on this case. Certificate of Service dated 09/27/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2727] (AS) [Entered: 09/27/2022 07:30 AM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Vanessa Molina on behalf of Appellee(s) Gregory Richardson. [22-2727] (VM) [Entered: 09/26/2022 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: Exhibits in support of docket entry #7 filed by Appellant Ashu Shukla to Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Show Cause. Certificate of Service dated 09/20/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2727]--[Edited 09/21/2022 by CJG]--[Edited 09/22/2022 by AMR] (AS) [Entered: 09/21/2022 12:11 AM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Ashu Shukla for Order to Show Cause to Identify the Final Order entered by District Court as Record, and Compel the district court to provide the documents to the plaintiff. Certificate of Service dated 09/20/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2727]--[Edited 09/21/2022 by CJG] (AS) [Entered: 09/21/2022 12:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellant Ashu Shukla to advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 09/16/2022. [22-2727] (AS) [Entered: 09/16/2022 06:57 PM] |
| Filing 5 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (NF) [Entered: 09/16/2022 12:20 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Ashu Shukla to Rely on Previously Filed Brief and Appendix, to compel or require Require Deloitte Consulting LLP to be added as a defendant on this case, for leave to adopt Third Circuit Court of Appeal's decision on plaintiff's Motion for IFP filed in case number(s) Case# 22-2029 doc# 19. Certificate of Service dated 09/16/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2727] (AS) [Entered: 09/16/2022 07:47 AM] |
| Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Self Represented (Pro-se) on behalf of Appellant(s) Ashu Shukla. [22-2727] (AS) [Entered: 09/16/2022 07:25 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 09/15/2022 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Ashu Shukla in District Court No. 3-19-cv-18117. (AMR) [Entered: 09/15/2022 04:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ashu Shukla v. Director United States Citizenship and Immigration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: ASHU SHUKLA | |
| Represented By: | Ashu Shukla |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: DIRECTOR UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES TEXAS SERVICE CENTER | |
| Represented By: | David E. Dauenheimer Esq. |
| Represented By: | Vanessa Molina Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
