Doherty KushimoIn re: Doherty Kushimo
| In re: DOHERTY KUSHIMO |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DAVID S. CERCONE |
| 22-2740 |
| September 20, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NONCOMPLIANCE Order, Action on the above-captioned petition for writ of mandamus is hereby deferred. Petitioner did not submit the filing fee or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the mandamus petition. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit or remit payment of the $500.00 filing fee. A form affidavit is enclosed for Petitioners convenience. As required by the affidavit form and statute, the motion must be accompanied by a certified statement of Petitioners institutional account for the six months prior to this date. It is noted that a petition for writ of mandamus is an original action and a separate motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must be filed, regardless of Petitioners fee status in other proceedings. If the filing fee is not paid or the motion is not filed, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 107.1. The petition will not be submitted to the Court until the filing fee or complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis is received. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(3). (LMR) [Entered: 09/20/2022 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner Doherty Kushimo. (LMR) [Entered: 09/20/2022 01:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
