James Tisdale v. Tim Betti, et al
| JAMES J. TISDALE |
| TIM BETTI, Warden, WELLPATH MEDICAL, DR. AMED, DR. NICK DEMIAN and DR. SATISH MALIK |
| 22-2755 |
| September 20, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee Tim Betti to legal division letter advising of possible dismissal to jurisdictional defect. Certificate of Service dated 10/12/2022. [22-2755]--[Edited 10/12/2022 by KR] (DMZ) [Entered: 10/12/2022 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Samuel H. Foreman on behalf of Appellee(s) Wellpath and Drs. Haseebuddin Ahmed, Nick Demian, and Satish Mallik. [22-2755] (SHF) [Entered: 09/23/2022 12:48 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Keanna Seabrooks on behalf of Appellee(s) Wellpath and Drs. Haseebuddin Ahmed, Nick Demian, and Satish Mallik. [22-2755] (KAS) [Entered: 09/23/2022 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Dana M. Zlotucha, Esquire on behalf of Appellee(s) Tim Betti (Warden, Lackawanna County Prison). [22-2755] (DMZ) [Entered: 09/23/2022 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (ZM) [Entered: 09/21/2022 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (KR) [Entered: 09/20/2022 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant James J. Tisdale in District Court No. 1-21-cv-01849. (KR) [Entered: 09/20/2022 02:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
