Gerald Bush v. Philadelphia Redevelopment Authority, et al
| GERALD BUSH |
| PHILADELPHIA REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, PAULITTE ADAMS and MR. HELLER, OF RDA |
| 22-2756 |
| September 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Gerald Bush v. Philadelphia Redevelopment Authority |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION in Support of Appeal with Exhibits filed by Appellant Mr. Gerald Bush. Clerk's office made service on 11/09/2022. Service made by ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 11/09/2022 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 12 Certificate of Service made by Appellant Mr. Gerald Bush on 10/28/2022 by hand delivery. (AMR) [Entered: 11/02/2022 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 11 Supplemental Amendment in Support of Appeal with Exhibits filed by Appellant Mr. Gerald Bush. Clerk's office made service on 10/31/2022. Service made by ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 10/31/2022 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 10 Supplemental Amendment in Support of Appeal with Exhibits filed by Appellant Mr. Gerald Bush. Clerk's office made service on 10/26/2022. Service made by ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 10/26/2022 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 9 Exhibits in Support of Appeal filed by Appellant Mr. Gerald Bush. Clerk's office made service on 10/25/2022. Service made by ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 10/25/2022 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 8 Supplemental Amendment in Support of Appeal with Exhibits filed by Appellant Mr. Gerald Bush. Clerk's office made service on 10/12/2022. Service made by ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 10/12/2022 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Mr. Gerald Bush to clerk order. Clerk's office made service on 10/04/2022. Service made by ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 10/04/2022 02:04 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The appeal will be submitted to a panel of this court for determination under 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e)(2) as to whether the appeal will be dismissed as legally frivolous or whether summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 is appropriate. In making this determination, the district court opinion and record will be examined. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. Appellee need not file a response unless directed to do so. The Court may reconsider in forma pauperis status or request additional information at any time during the course of this appeal. (AMR) [Entered: 09/29/2022 04:43 PM]
|
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: Sean A. Kirkpatrick NOT PARTICIPATING: Appellee State of Pennsylvania in 22-2756, Respondent State of Pennsylvania in 22-2583 will not participate in this appeal, received. [22-2756, 22-2583] (SAK) [Entered: 09/28/2022 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION filed by Petitioner Mr. Gerald Bush in 22-2583, Appellant Mr. Gerald Bush in 22-2756 to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 10/07/2022. Clerk's office made service on 09/27/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2583, 22-2756] (AMR) [Entered: 09/27/2022 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jennifer Popelack on behalf of Appellee(s) Philadelphia Redevelopment Authority, Gregory Heller, Christi M. Jackson, Robert Labrum. [22-2756] (JP) [Entered: 09/22/2022 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 09/21/2022 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Gerald Bush in District Court No. 2-20-cv-05631. (CJG) [Entered: 09/21/2022 10:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
